There is nothing worse than a die-hard neoconservative. Of all the socialist horrors wrought against the American public by the Obama administration and its small but impressively insane group of followers, the neoliberals are at least relatively open about their disdain for the Constitution as well as their intentions to reduce our country to a Third World communist enclave. Neoconservatives, on the other hand, have the audacity to pretend as if they adore the Bill of Rights, posing as freedom fighters and champions of liberty while working intently to administer the same exact despotic policies and socialist infrastructure.
As most readers are aware, the false left/right paradigm has been the primary control mechanism used against the American people for decades. The idea being that in order for establishment elites to maintain control of a population with a heritage of independence, a facade of choice must be created to placate the dim-witted masses while the system itself is dominated from behind the scenes. The people of a republic must be conned into participating in the process of their own enslavement, at least until the oligarchs are ready to unleash full-blown totalitarianism. The concept of free elections becomes a grand theatrical display when most candidates, regardless of party affiliation, are bought, bribed, blackmailed or philosophically allied with the elite. The actions of these candidates speak far louder than their rhetoric for those with the sense to pay attention. But for many people, the attachment to the sports team mentality of politics is just too much to resist. For them, the circus is reality.
The birth of neoconservatism is clouded by what some claim to be the “incidental” relationship between neocon adherents like Irving and William Kristol, Abram Shulsky, Paul Wolfowitz, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush, among others, and a little-known political science professor by the name of Leo Strauss. Strauss’ work culminated in the University Of Chicago as many of his students and followers went on to engineer the rise of an insidious bureaucratic machine that gave us the Patriot Acts, the fake War on Terror, rationalized torture procedures and numerous other constitutional disgraces.
Strauss was at least publicly opposed to the formation of communism; but at the same time, he held a reverence for a pre-Weimar Germany brand of authoritarian oligarchy. To fight the rise of “liberalism,” Strauss maintained that the use of “noble lies” was preferable to surrender. That is to say, the left was so devilish that an “any means necessary” approach became acceptable. This approach, interpreted by Strauss’ students, was meant to include the creation of false unity in the face of a fabricated enemy.
Strauss himself argued that enemies were vital in the unification of man:
“Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed. Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united — and they can only be united against other people.”
It is important to note that the “noble lie” concept was also a primary pillar in the philosophical methods of another political gatekeeper by the name of Saul Alinsky, a gatekeeper who just happened to become prominent during the same era as Strauss and who influenced the same generation, but on the left end of the spectrum, giving birth to what we now call neoliberalism. Much in the way internationalists simultaneously funded the rise of fascism in Europe and communism in Russia during the 20th Century, I do not believe it is simple coincidence that these gatekeepers would both go on to successfully galvanize two sides of American society against each other based on false premises while both of them were promoting nearly identical forms of moral relativism.
Both ideologies argue in speech for either “liberal values” or “conservative values.” But the tactics they use can end only one way, regardless of which side wins out: with despotism being the ultimate result. The identical policy measures taken by the administrations of both George W. Bush and Barack Obama in terms of war, executive powers, personal privacy (FISA and NSA domestic surveillance), torture, indefinite detention (including U.S. citizens as per the NDAA), assassination (including U.S. citizens), etc., clearly illustrate that there is truly no discernible concrete difference between Republican leadership and Democratic leadership.
The brilliance of the false left/right paradigm is that it mesmerizes the public with two cosmetically separate but inherently identical political movements, and it distracts Americans away from the more plausible third option: namely, personal liberty and responsibility, also known as classical liberalism, practiced by the Founding Fathers. Neoconservatism in particular is highly destructive to our constitutional heritage, because it poses as constitutionalism while seeking to erode liberty from within. The neoliberal side of the paradigm uses the stark viciousness of neocons to convince the public that socialization is a necessary measure to humanize government. The neoconservative side of the paradigm uses the foreign policy “weakness” of neoliberals to then argue for a return to greater militarization and force of law. Both methods result in a perpetually growing government and inevitable tyranny.
In the near term, I believe it is possible that we are about to see the left/right game switch gears once again.
The rise of ISIS and the increased threat of economic war with Russia have highlighted the old “weak liberal” talking points in conservative circles, while conveniently ignoring the fact that all our current problems were created by elites on both sides of the aisle.
What I see simmering under the surface of the geopolitical cinema conjured to distract us is a burgeoning trend toward a return of the neoconservative narrative. With the sudden and apparently "inexplicable" rise of the ISIS caliphate, not to mention the debut of a new cartoon villian, Khorasan, it is only a matter of time before America is smattered with terror attacks. The anger of the general public towards the Obama Administration is already at a peak; with war at our doorstep, people may demand immediate changes.
In my last article, 'When War Erupts Patriots Will Be Accused Of Aiding "The Enemy"', I warned of the underlying propaganda trend used by the establishment to falsely associate the Liberty Movement with foreign aggression. A clear tactic is being developed to hijack the Liberty Movement's identity by labeling patriot dissension as treason, and marginalizing our efforts as merely a mercenary extension of Russian and/or ISIS subversion. This is not the only dangerous method threatening liberty activism, however. Co-option of the movement by elements of the neoconservative side of the globalist coin is also ever present...
While it is true that America has been made weaker with each passing year, both defensively and economically, it is important that we question what exactly our response should be. Is the solution to swing the pendulum right back to the neoconservative standards of centralized military-industrial might and trading freedom for security? Or how about a military coup to unseat Obama and put the country "back on track"? Would the removal of a middle-management puppet like Obama by a group of patriot-posers among the military brass really change anything in the long run? The coup idea is being floated everywhere the past two years, in some cases by neocon talking heads presenting themselves as liberty movement leaders.
There are always the old standby neocon peddlers like John McCain and Lindsay Graham, who are both avid supporters of greater executive power, including the defense of torture, indefinite detention, and assassination of American citizens. But when such politicians use ISIS as a villainous prop to frighten the citizenry with visions of masked gunman and mushroom clouds, liberty proponents remember that ghouls like McCain were involved in the funding and training of the same extremists that now make up the core of the ISIS threat.
The so-called “moderate” Free Syrian Army, a group entirely created by Western covert intelligence agencies, has been interweaving with the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) for some time. Meanwhile, neocons like Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) argue that FSA members are the “good guys.”
Once again, I have to go back to the neoconservative ideology, which holds that unification requires the creation of enemies in order to galvanize peoples and nations around a centralized leadership. We have seen mounting evidence that ISIS is a fully fabricated monstrosity. We see fake Republicans like McCain involved from the very beginning of the process, admonishing President Obama for his participation while HELPING Obama with his mission. And now we see these same instigators coming to the American people with promises of utter terror if we do not rally around their governance.
An important point to grasp here is that all political leaders are ultimately expendable in the view of the internationalists. A shift to the left, or a shift to the right, makes no difference to them, as long as they control the momentum. Obama is a puppet whose public image could easily be sacrificed in order to gain a power advantage. It is important to understand that if the Liberty Movement cannot be destroyed, the elites may attempt to insert it's own "leaders" into our midst in classic Cointelpro fashion and rally us in a misguided battle to unseat Obama and replace him with yet another globalist stooge.
We do have infiltrators who, in my view, are seeking to co-opt our initiative and divert the efforts of constitutional proponents away from the true enemies of our republic (namely, internationalist financiers calling for total globalization) using the looming threat of an extremist Islamic terror campaign.
One such example (one of many) is Fox News contributor Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, who has been skulking around my neck of the woods in Montana, attempting to sell his version of the final liberty “solution” to the large community of patriots in the region. Vallely’s answer to the problem appears to be an extension of the Operation American Spring project, which he has been promoting every year for as long as I can remember and has been relabeled over and over, and which has failed every year to produce the million-man armed march on Washington, D.C., that it calls for. The strategy has now evolved into what essentially amounts to a military coup led by neoconservative brass.
Vallely’s suggestions are certainly enticing to some, and his rhetoric sounds rather similar to what many in organizations like Oath Keepers believe. However, there is a distinct difference. Oath Keepers and other legitimate patriot groups do not focus only on middlemen like Obama, and any organization that claims Obama is the source of all our ills is either rife with ignorance, or is controlled opposition. By extension, a military coup led by politicized generals who may very well be controlled by the same globalist interests as Obama is not an expression of constitutional revolution. It is, in fact, a warped and twisted facsimile of revolution. The idea is alluring because many Americans want to take direct action to remove corrupt government, but they do not want to risk their lives to do it. That is to say, they would much rather the "professionals" handle their rebellion for them.
Military coup takes the responsibility of constitutional revolution away from the people and places it the hands of a select few. What this means is that a military coup led by Washington-bred generals is actually advantageous to the elites because it allows them to undermine legitimate rebellion without directly confronting it at the risk of energizing it. Two birds are thus killed with one stone: The revolutionary momentum is derailed, and the establishment maintains control through military puppets who have more room to impose greater totalitarianism through overt force.
But what if those generals were rock-solid constitutionalists, some might ask? We can only guess at the result, but I can say with certainty that pretenders like Vallely are NOT constitutionalists.
Before Vallely settled in Montana to become a “freedom fighter” he was most famous for co-authoring a Department of Defense white paper called “From Psyop To Mind War,” published in 1980.
The paper devises fourth-generation warfare methods to paralyze entire nations with complex propaganda, turning the population against itself and its own interests so that controllers do not have to expend vast military resources to defeat them conventionally. This strategy was deemed preferable, as it would reduce destruction of resources while still establishing dominance and/or destabilization. It is also a strategy that was recommended for use against the American people (not to mention the utilization of “ESP” as a weapon, but we don’t have time to get into that garbage). The Arab Spring, funded and directed by covert intelligence agencies, is a perfect example of Mind War in action. And in light of this, I find it interesting that Vallely would champion a project labeled "Operation American Spring", as if the joke on us is right out in the open.
The other author of “From Psyop To Mind War” is a man by the name of Michael Aquino, who has a foggy career history beyond his status as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. military and allegedly an employee of the NSA. What is not a mystery is Aquino’s religious orientation. The man is an open Satanist, a former member of the Church of Satan, and a current member of his own Temple of Set. (Aquino founded the Temple of Set five years before working with Vallely, meaning his darker theological leanings were well known to any of his peers). Whether or not one has a Christian orientation, one should still be compelled to question the moral intentions of a man who curls his eyebrows to look like horns, worships either the myth or the actual embodiment of the prince of darkness, and tries to present such activities as a mere expression of rationalism. One should also be compelled to question the moral and mental compass of anyone who would willingly maintain a working relationship with such a person and then suddenly fight the good fight as a "Christian patriot". I have not found a single instance in which Vallely has stood in public opposition to Aquino or denounced the methods of “From Psyop to Mind War.” And to this day, Aquino thanks Vallely for his efforts on the white paper.
After retiring from the military, Vallely became a client of Benedor Associates, a neoconservative public relations firm. And he continues to ally closely with neoconservative political elites. It should come as no surprise then that just like McCain, Vallely also took a trip to Syria, on the same day as the infamous sarin gas attack — the same gas attack that was most likely perpetrated by Muslim extremist groups as a false flag against the Syrian government, and which almost led America into World War III. In response, Valley called for increased U.S. government support for the FSA insurgents, the same insurgents that are joining ISIS in droves.
So why is a retired neoconservative U.S. general who wrote a psychological warfare paper with a DoD Satanist supporting extremist insurgency in the Middle East while suggesting military coup in the United States? I can only suggest that the Hegelian dialectic is in full force. The elites conjure a frightening enemy in the form of ISIS, attacks occur that distract the masses away from the internationalists, and the chaos that follows — whether it results in revolution or military coup — is then sold to the world as a natural by-product of a crumbling Western world due to the misguided zealotry of “conservatives.” After the dust settles, the men who made the collapse possible move forward with the global centralization they always wanted, using America as a horror story to teach future generations of children in Common Core-style classrooms about the barbaric attachments to national sovereignty and individualism.
A fanciful conspiracy theory? Perhaps. Or perhaps it’s a very real possibility if the liberty movement and conservatives in general are suckered into the neocon fold once again. The U.S. is back in Syria, this time to commit air strikes on the same terror groups OUR GOVERNMENT created to fight Assad. ISIS elements have called for attacks on U.S. citizens in response. The Neocon sharks are in a frenzy, ready to offer false leadership once again. The only question left is, will the citizenry follow, will they stick with establishment muppet, Barack Obama, or, will they finally cast off the false left/right paradigm, and choose to lead themselves?
You can contact Brandon Smith at: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.
To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page here:
http://www.alt-market.com/donate
Silver and Gold are on their way back to historic highs, and now is the time to buy. Let LibertyCPM.com help you decide how to best protect your savings and insulate you from an ever destabilizing dollar.
Do you have enough Non-GMO seeds in case of economic collapse? Seeds are the OTHER alternative currency, and if you aren't stocked, then you aren't prepared. To buy top quality non-GMO seeds at a special 10% discount, visit Humble Seed, and use the code Alt10
written by lookup , September 25, 2014
Thank you for laying it out for all to see.
written by iwitness02 , September 25, 2014
My opinion is that the nation will have to experience an event that leaves them starkly frightened, before any real change of 'mind set' takes place.
The level of chatter seems to be increasing with every passing week. Seems as though the pot may be going to a full roiling boil soonly. It is getting to the point where it seems to be causing tension. Although not many understand the underlying cause of the tension. There is evidence of tension in the fact that patience seems to be a thing of the past. It is a small example but it shows up everyday.
written by Seen2013 , September 25, 2014
Unfortunately, I find myself in conversations who believe a military coup, Operation American Spring, and Constitutional Convention appear to be applauded.
1). My first exposure to military coup proponents was when I participated on a forum discussion linking to Divine Cosmos interview who were basically saying martial law wouldn't be declared and the military would be arrested NWO proponents albeit arguing against Posse Commitatius (pardon the spelling).
Shouldn't it be obvious that it's a ruse?
2). My first exposure to the Operation American Spring was a few years ago on another website who argued against its legitemacy. I agree with that author as American Spring like the designed Arab Spring reference called for taking the lion's share of dissidents right to the worst possible location. If this ever gets its desire, the lion's share of dissident will be entraped around DC and ultimately destroyed by death and detainment NDAA style. Take a good long look at the map with the surrounding bases, once this movement gets its desire and marches, it will not return.
3). The Constitutional Convention requires that they observe it to return to it....
Remember everything is on the table, they'll just adjust it to look something like this The World Parlament: The Earth Constitution...
Inevitably, as Brandon Smith highlighted, those methods avoid activists to seek strengthening resolve... By the way, the globalist love that because truth alone doesn't set one free; it creates doubt. Doubt creates reevaluation, and renewed dedication creates resolve. Resolve is needed to set one free. Truth is the door; it's up to one to walk through it or cast the doubt away.
written by JQP , September 25, 2014
Let's not forget that, Vallely's colleague in the intelligence "community," Special Forces Lt. Col. Michael Aquino figured prominently in the 1986 San Francisco Presidio day care scandal of ritual satanic abuse of children—an investigation that magically disappeared without resolution.
written by cglabb , September 26, 2014
People will never come to see what this true evil is because it doesn't present itself in a hockey mask with machete or finger knives. I'm a cold war vet and have tried on innumerable occasions to sway the civilian to what is real and what is the grand façade, to no avail. Unfortunately, it will take an actual event to make the general populace wake up and smell it.
written by thought criminal , September 26, 2014
If you were in power, you would want to know who might be capable of undermining you, or who might put up the biggest fight, if push comes to shove.
Therefore, you will need intelligence operations to flush out your perceived enemies.
IMO that Bundy ranch event was pure psyop, designed to see what kind of reaction the movement would have. And they were filming everyone who showed up.
Stay awake, and aware.
written by Implied Violins , September 26, 2014
Great article, I've been reading your stuff since I saw your first article posted on ZeroHedge. Unfortunately, from what I see I think you are right about what is coming. There are a lot of COINTELPRO sites building momentum towards the narrative you describe: Veterans Today, Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts etc. I think a coup is forthcoming in some manner, unfortunately.
However: I think when this occurs, there will be momentous blowback. Even if martial law is declared, and a few pawns of the NWO crowd are "sacrificed", things will escalate beyond their ability to control the narrative. There is so much wrong in so many places, so much that needs to be changed: fracking, chemtrails, Fukushima, Deep Water Horizon, GMO foods, cronyism in the courts and government etc. that once the first domino falls I think there will be a release, a wave of action pushing for change on all these fronts - and I believe much of this will come from amongst those the globalists would rely on to impose their will on us.
With Obama and a few others gone, tensions will break and an avalanche will begin. People will come out of the woodwork to reveal ALL. There will be an outpouring of Chelsea Mannings and Edward Snowdens, too many to stop. Many within the armed forces will reveal wrongdoings, much as Kristen Meghan has done from within the air force exposing chemtrails (a link to her video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHm0XhtDyZA - the action kicks up at the 6 minute mark). People will push for change, on EVERY level. And it will be too much for them to stop...
written by Brandon Smith , September 26, 2014
@thought criminal
Not every Liberty event is a psy-op. I knew many people involved in the Bundy Ranch stand-off. I helped coordinate supplies for guys on the ground. The Bundy's were legitimately threatened by the BLM, and the defeat of the BLM was a true victory for the Liberty Movement.
As opposed to Operation American Spring, which was an attempt at a completely fabricated stand-off event controlled from the top down, the Bundy Ranch was the opposite - a spontaneous event generated from the bottom up. Don't get me wrong, we know of at least two people there who were possible feds, and I'm sure they were taking names. However, we can't let paranoia stop us from doing what is right. LET THEM TAKE NAMES! Let their list grow into the millions. It won't matter when the time comes. If everyone fights back, lists become rather useless.
written by Brabantian , September 27, 2014
Very funny how nearly everyone is fooled by some part of the 'limited hang-out' psy-op infiltration. In comments above 'Implied Violins' scorns "Veterans Today, Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts" as deception agents ... and then a few sentences later falls right into the trap of one of the most blatant psy-op deceptions of all, Dick Cheney's and Zbig Brzezinski's pal, the laughably fake 'Edward Snowden' and his top shill, Rothschild family employee and asset Glenn Greenwald ... the hoax worked so well, even people who know better, tremble to speak about the blatantly obvious Snowden fraud, for fear of losing their audience
Russia gov intel agency (FSB, SVR) report, 'Snowden Greenwald are CIA frauds pt1'
http://homment.com/3K3xdsYD7a
And Glenn Greenwald, curiously, has the same profile as another CIA shill, Jimbo Wales, 'founder' of the CIA's Wikipedia ... both were in the pornography business before taking on their CIA roles working for billionaires ... Wikipedia being the biggest internet fraud of all, 'Trojan Horse' for hoaxes by US intel agents and US ruling families, its lies put by CIA-Google at top of search results and duplicated verbatim on other 'top sites' like the Jerusalem-based 'Answers-com' ... ex-pornographer Wiki chief Jimmy Wales being so key to Mossad as well as CIA, he goes to intimate birthday parties of Israel's President ...
EU police report - 'CIA Wikipedia Fraud, and 20 Major Techniques of Wikipedia Deception'
http://homment.com/FB3PjBQ2DF
written by Implied Violins , September 27, 2014
...about Snowden and Greenwald. I wondered about them after Greenwald's boss Pierre Omidyar was found to have backed the Ukrainian insurrection, and the fact that Omidyar is an American who is PAYING Greenwald to present Snowden's info but no one is accusing HIM of being a traitor raises a red flag. However, I still give credit to them for awakening people to the reality that their government isn't what they thought it was; even if they are being railroaded down the wrong tracks they are at least moving now.
written by Bodhi Mom , September 28, 2014
Thanks for this article. I have been watching Vallely and his website through the years. He is definitely not to be trusted. And the deception and PsyOp can get pretty devious and down the rabbit hole. These types of people are not men of God by their actions. So you can therefore figure out where their real allegiance is. Bottom line - this is Spiritual Warfare on this planet.
written by Boon Vickerson is out there , September 28, 2014
Mr. Smith you write some really good stuff, many things you have written about have inspired me to the truth of us.
Having said that, I want to write something for you to consider. I hope it is taken in the light it is given.
You have not quite figured out his constitutionalist ideology blinds you to the true path to liberty.
Your latest observations in this piece are most worthy of every freeman reading. With the exception the constitution never worked as sold. It was a scam of the elites from the get go to do exactly the same thing the neocons commit to mollify and delude the people.
You are almost there Mr. Smith, you almost get it. I hope one day you see the light, as you are very much capable of helping the movement towards zero government. I think you will, as you will soon discover the constitution never worked as sold, and the end game of its intended purpose is at hand, and those who hide behind it are the most vile and worst enemies of liberty. It is time to stop defending the constitution, time to point out those who use refuge behind it to create an appearance of legitimacy and gull us from the true nature of their agenda.
To understand where I am coming from here Mr. Smith, I believe much as you do on many things, but where we diverge involves the nature of Liberty and law. I contend a freeman does not need laws, for liberty is the highest law, that no document or laws is as good or right or proper as a mans liberty, his natural primal born freedom and his liberty to determine his own life in its entirety. That no government, or bodies of laws, or screw sanction of those principles of freedom is necessary, and that we have been sold a false bill of goods and generations of Americans have been deluded and waylaid to the state being necessary to "protect" those natural laws and rights that always have been the domain of the sovereign individual, and only the individual. That abiding by the power of government to determine what is our liberty already we gave up our liberty.
To any who doubt my words, let me ask you to ask yourself, how has things worked so far?
To those who disdain or discount this truth of our liberty, the crux of which is we don't need no steenkin' government, we should determine our own lives in entirety, then and only then do you become truly free in liberty, let me ask you, how else do we make liberty work?
Cause nothing in all of recorded human history, no entity or form of government, except the freeman himself has ever created liberty. Even the US Constitution. From the moment of its ratification our liberty has been eroded, cut down to a mere ghost of what it was before that document was signed.
And to the point you so well stated about the false paradigm of the sonofabitches running things Mr. Smith, they would not exist if we ourselves determined what our liberty is, without that greatest con of men the elites of the time drew up and sold as a guarantee against the tyranny of despots and tyrants.
Just look what that parchment got us Mr. Smith.
We where sold out, and continue to be sold a bag of feces' by liars thugs and thieves dressed up as a wedding cake.
Like you said, there really is no voting our way out of this.
Not with a ballot.
And certainly not without our liberty as it truly is, understood in no uncertain terms.
That we are all free, that we are The sovereign, that it is ours to determine, that no state or its actors have any power greater or better our wiser than that which is ours and only ours and always has been and always will be. And the sooner we grok that truth of us, the sooner we are free and have our liberty.
It all starts there Mr. Smith, it all begins with each of us. There is no other way out. Only more of the same if we ignore the truth of us and our liberty.
written by amanfromMars , September 28, 2014
Hi, Brandon,
The following is what you can reasonably expect of folk taken inequitable advantage of, and taken for fools to be used as tools .......
Isis 'fanboys' may now switch to attacks in UK, say terror experts
Analysts say west's action in Middle East could lead jihadists to stay in Britain rather than travel abroad …… Mark Townsend The Observer, Saturday 27 September 2014 22.00 BST
Well, let us all hope, if that be the case and not just a lot of ye ole FUD that systems use to realise and justify their action, that they target just those and that which voted for military conflict and would propagate war on people rather than deliver peace, and leave the mass general public alone to not become collateral damage and virtual fuel for the system to pour on the raging fires they have started.
Such would be only fair and proper and focus everyone’s attention on that which really matters. If you want to play silly serious games, there be silly serious consequences. And such a change would be quite different and have every possibility of being a global game changer.
Oh, and create more inflammatory news for media to spread and create a certain picture.
Is there any chance soon of there being something more novel and creative and revolutionary rather than all of the doom and gloom and austerity which fails everyone so miserably? Are new tales needed for y'all to follow to a new place where all is in ITs Command and Control?
written by Brandon Smith , September 28, 2014
@Boon
Obviously, the Constitution is not a perfect document, which is why the Bill of Rights was added to it, but I have to say, the whole claim that the Constitution was some "scheme" by the elites simply doesn't hold water. Where is your evidence of such a longstanding ploy? I hear that argument often from sovereign citizen types and they never seem to have any actual evidence to support their claims.
Also, why would the elites "create" a Constitution which they would then have to spend the next TWO CENTURIES desperately trying to dismantle piece by piece? It doesn't make any sense, even from a false paradigm perspective.
Again, it's not perfect, but there is no secret plan behind the Constitution. Without it I think total open globalization would have taken place decades ago. The only reason the Constitution is now failing is because We The People have abandoned our responsibility to defend it and ourselves for so long.
written by Automaticsteam , September 29, 2014
I took a quantum leap beyond Party as I travelled rabbit holes, peeling onion skins.
The result of some of that quest is published in the No Party Manifesto.
"Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and many other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18);"
RICO Act
wiki definition "A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket were not to exist. Conducting a racket is racketeering.[1] Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. An archetype is the protection racket, wherein a person or group indicates that they could protect a store from potential damage, damage that the same person or group would otherwise inflict, while the correlation of threat and protection may be more or less deniably veiled, distinguishing it from the more direct act of extortion."
GEORGE WASHINGTON FAREWELL ADDRESS:
Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that for the efficient management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.
I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments
written by Automaticsteam , September 29, 2014
The People are insulated from their (self-)government by means of Parties; Private, Professional, Political, Parties.
The Parties, which in concert by overt deception (making campaign promises (lies); misappropriating tax dollars; theft by deception through currency and financial manipulation; etc) create an impenatrable cartel in their synergy, and self-promotion and seizure of and perpetuation in power over the reins of government, being paramount to to the interests of the People, the Republic, and the execution of their oaths of office, being, Rulers, rather than servants, purposefully insulating the People; the Individual; the Citizen - the smallest minority - thereby enslaving them to nebulous and foreign interpretations of the Constitution and undermining by policy, and rule thereby.
Until we abandon Party in our political process, we will be enslaved by them, and will be attempting to effect change and Liberty in a corrupt system designed for the opposite purposes: To enslave to their racket.
written by Boon Vickerson is out there , October 07, 2014
Proof is certainly debatable.
To me the proof lies with my liberty. Your liberty is yours and I can not speak for it. My proof is in my liberty, as liberty is something wholly to me something only each of us can determine, proof I have come to grasp no paper or law can be allowed to supplant my self determination, proof is so obvious and compelling for me because it is liberty or death, there can not be liberty any other way for me. Easy said than done I know, but there it is. I have made that choice, and in trying to understand that choice, I have come to see the constitution as an extension of administrative fiat. It is a document, to me, which opened the door, and the reasons are manifold, to what we have today.
We can argue the nuances and complexities till our bones are dust, for me the proof is after two and a quarter centuries, that document has not worked as advertized, in my 60 years on Gods green Earth, not once do I have proof that my liberty and my self determination has benefitted or has liberty or self determination been increased or created due to that document. Show me proof otherwise Mr. Smith. Show me proof you created your safe haven idea because the constitution works as sold? Show me proof you run this excellent alternative media blog and market place of ideas because the constitution protects all of us from tyranny?
Show me proof Mr Smith I am wrong.
I will gladly accept your argument.
I want that document to work with all my heart. But in my heart of hearts I believe it was far more than a flawed document. I believe in the ideals and principles of Republican form of government, I admire the reason and cause the founders worked long and hard for, but that document it was a terrible compromise to too many factions and leaders of the various free states. I see proof as the free states, the people of them surrendered something inherently free, their primal freedoms to the power of a piece of parchment bestowed upon it by the elite men of the time. I see a pattern there as today, elites, the great unwashed, sold a bill of attainer, administered by strangers, for their own good.
To me, proof is it is a matter of difference in scale from the moment that document was signed to today.
It ain't working Mr. Smith. It never did.
written by Brandon Smith , October 08, 2014
@Boon
No one can show proof of a negative, buddy, that is a distraction from the point. I can't show you proof, for example, that aliens don't exist, or that the lochness monster isn't real. I can only address the proof others SHOW ME that they are real, and determine whether it is factual or not.
You cannot produce any proof that the Constitution is part of some grand long term conspiracy. You haven't even been able to produce a realistic hypothetical theory.
All the bluster aside, and as I stated before, the Constitution is just a representation of natural law. It is not an entity that can defend itself. THAT IS OUR JOB. If the constitution is failing, then it is because WE have not done our job. The idea that the Constitution is supposed to protect us is a fallacy. We are supposed to protect the constitution. Period.
Beyond that, if the constitution "never worked" then why are the elites trying so desperately to dismantle it? Why do they care about it if it is secretly working in their favor? You have to apply logic to these things, Boon, rather than blind assumptions.
