How Vaccine Hysteria Could Spark Totalitarian Nightmare

This article was written by Lee Hieb, M.D., and originally published at World Net Daily

Gov. Chris Christie has been vilified for making a very simple statement – that parents (and presumably patients themselves) should have the freedom to choose whether to vaccinate their children. I have been asked for years what I thought about vaccination, so let me lay out the issues.

Before getting into the science, lets discuss the philosophy:

1. The voices shrieking to forcibly vaccinate people are the same voices shrieking to support a woman’s right to choose abortion under Roe v. Wade. If a woman’s body is sacrosanct, if she has the right to choose to deliver a child or not, if she has total authority over her body, how can she not have the right to accept or refuse a vaccination?

2. Medical ethics are clear: No one should be forced to undergo a medical treatment without informed consent and without their agreement to the treatment. We condemn the forced sterilization of the ’20s and ’30s, the Tuskegee medical experiments infecting black inmates and the Nazi medicine that included involuntary “Euthanasia,” experimentation and sterilization. How can we force vaccination without consent? Vaccination is a medical treatment with risks including death. It is totally antithetical to all ethics in medicine to mandate that risk to others.

3. Science is never “concluded.” Mr. Obama and other ideologues may think the truth is finalized (“The science is indisputable”), but the reality is our understanding of disease and treatment are constantly being updated. Just like Newton’s mechanical paradigm of the universe was supplanted by Einsteinian physics, and physicists today modify that view, medical “truth” is not the truth for long. In an attempt to quantify change in medicine, years ago a cardiology journal discussed “The Half-life of Truth.” cardiologists looked back in their journal at 20-year-old articles to see how much of what was believed then was still believed to be true. The answer? 50 percent. So in cardiology, at least – and in all of medicine to greater or lesser degree – only half of what we believe now will still be true in 20 or so years. The last word on vaccination is not in. It hasn’t even begun to be written.

4. If you believe absolutely in the benefit and protective value of vaccination, why does it matter what others do? Or don’t do? If you believe you need vaccination to be healthy and protected, then by all means vaccinate your child and yourself. Why should you even be concerned what your neighbor chooses to do for his child – if vaccination works? The idea of herd immunity is still based on the idea that in individual cases vaccines actually are protective.

5. If you think the government has the right to forcibly vaccinate people – for the good of society – what is to prevent them from forcibly sterilizing people, or forcibly euthanizing people, or forcibly implanting a tracking device – for the good of society? You make think those examples are extreme (although two-thirds have happened), but the principle is the same. You are allowing government to have ultimate authority over your body.

So, I’ve been asked, “Why not vaccinate your children? Why not take the influenza vaccine?” Well, I believe the choice is up to you. I’ve covered my thinking about the influenza vaccine in an article in the Journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, available online, but here are some facts about childhood vaccines that make me think twice about their use. I traced these points back to the source, so these are not blindly reprinted from hearsay Internet articles. In some cases I found public references to be wrong but the data to be correct when I got to the source. Much of this comes from government reporting. Anyone can research disease incidence by reading MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) from the CDC and accessing the search engine for VAERS (Vaccine complication reporting site) at http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php.

1. Since 2005 (and even before that), there have been no deaths in the U.S. from measles, but there have been 86 deaths from MMR vaccine – 68 of them in children under 3 years old. And there were nearly 2,000 disabled.

2. In countries which use BCG vaccinations against tuberculosis, the incidence of Type I diabetes in children under 14 is nearly double. (“Infectious Disease in Clinical Practice” no. 6 pages 449-454, 1997)

3. As reported in Lancet in 1995, inflammatory bowel disease (i.e. Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis) is 13 times more prevalent in persons vaccinated for measles.

4. In a nested case-control study within the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) in the United Kingdom, patients who had a first MS (Multiple Sclerosis) diagnosis recorded were compared with controls. The authors concluded that immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is associated with a threefold increased risk of developing MS (Hernan et al., 2004). No increased risk of MS was associated with other vaccines, which included tetanus and influenza vaccinations.

5. In 1982 William Torch, a prolific researcher and publisher on Neurologic topics, presented a paper (later published) at the American Academy of Neurology reviewing SIDS deaths. He reported that in 100 consecutive cases, 70 percent of SIDS deaths occurred within three weeks of pertussis vaccination. In very convincing confirmation, a Japanese prefecture stopped vaccinating after associating SIDS with the pertussis vaccine. It is worth reading the entire description from Viera Scheibner, PhD:

In 1975, about 37 Crib Sudden Deaths were linked to vaccination in Japan. Doctors in one prefecture boycotted vaccinations, and refused to vaccinate. The Japanese government paid attention and stopped vaccinating children below the age of 2 years. When immunization was delayed until a child was 24 months of age, Sudden Infant Death cases and claims for vaccine related deaths disappeared. Japan zoomed from a high 17th place in infant mortality rate to the lowest infant mortality rate in the world when they stopped vaccinating. Japan didn’t vaccinate any children below the age of 2 years between 1975 and 1988, for 13 years. But then in 1988, Japanese parents were given the choice to start vaccinating anywhere between 3 months and 48 months. The Ministry study group studied 2,720 SIDS cases occurring between 1980 and 1992 and they established that their very low SIDS rate quadrupled.

6. A mail survey was done of 635 children in the Netherlands in 2004. German measles and whooping cough (pertussis) were twice as common in unvaccinated children. However, throat inflammations, ear infections, rheumatologic complaints, seizures and febrile convulsions were much more common in the vaccinated group. Aggressive behavioral episodes were eight times more frequent in vaccinated children, and sleep disordered more often. Tonsils were removed in 33 percent of children who had been vaccinated vs. 7.3 percent unvaccinated.

7. In 1947, the first reports of brain inflammation and chronic brain damage, including death, after pertussis vaccination began to be published (Brody, 1947; Byers and Moll, 1948, Low, 1955, Berg, 1958; Strom, 1960, 1967; Dick, 1967, 1974; Kuhlenkampff, 1974; Stewart, 1977, 1979). But it took more than 40 years of collective evidence before academic medicine decided it was true –1981 National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES) and in 1991 and 1994 by the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences.

In 1991, after reviewing vaccine safety, the Institute of Medicine admitted, “In the course of its review, the committee encountered many gaps and limitations in knowledge bearing directly or indirectly on the safety of vaccines. These include inadequate understanding of the biologic mechanisms underlying adverse events following natural infection or immunization, insufficient or inconsistent information from case reports and case series, inadequate size or length of followup of many population based epidemiologic studies [and] few experimental studies published in relation to the number of epidemiologic studies published.”

So the next question is: Does vaccination work? Does it really protect you against disease? The answer is variable. Smallpox vaccine seems to be nearly universally protective against the very fatal disease of smallpox, and use of vaccine led to the eradication of the disease in the wild. But the dirty little secret in recent outbreaks of mumps, measles and pertussis is – they are occurring in vaccinated people in highly vaccinated populations!

In 2006 an epidemic of mumps broke out in my state of Iowa. Ultimately, 11 states reported 2,597 cases of mumps. The majority of mumps cases (1,487) were reported from Iowa. As reported in “Mumps Epidemic – Iowa, 2006,” “Despite control efforts and a highly vaccinated population, this epidemic has spread across Iowa and potentially to neighboring states.” According to the CDC, “During the prevaccine era, nearly everyone in the United States experienced mumps, and 90 percent of cases occurred among children, although 97 percent of children entering school in Iowa had received two doses of MMR vaccine. ” Of note, this outbreak mostly occurred in young adults of college age who had received the vaccine. Only 6 percent of those affected were known to be unvaccinated, 12 percent received one dose of MMR vaccine, 51 percent had two doses of MMR vaccine, and 31 percent (mostly adults) were not sure of their immunization history.

In 2008-2009, Australia had epidemics of whooping cough and measles. Health authorities there must reveal the vaccination status of children in epidemics. Eighty-four percent of Australian children who got whooping cough were fully vaccinated, and 78 percent who got measles had record of measles vaccination.

In the 2010 outbreak of whooping cough in California, well over half the victims were fully vaccinated.

Whooping cough continuously declined in the U.S. from over 100,000 cases in 1922 to around 1978 when 2,063 cases were reported. That year, pertussis vaccine became mandated for school attendance. Beginning around 1995, when the U.S. had 5,137 cases, the incidence has increased, to 2012 when over 48,000 cases were reported, including 20 deaths. The majority of deaths were in newborns under three months of age. Why is this happening? It is not because people are not becoming vaccinated. The CDC says more than 84 percent of children under 3 years old have been vaccinated with four doses of pertussis vaccine. But the current vaccine does not include all strains of pertussis. And the most vulnerable to the disease – the small infants – are not able to take the vaccine. Since older children and adults are much less likely to die of whooping cough, the question that must be asked is this: Is vaccination effective in producing antibody transfer from mother to infant? Or is it better to allow the natural disease to occur?

Finally, it turns out that death and disability from many childhood diseases is preventable by means other than vaccination. Vitamin A has been known since the 1930s to reduce mortality from measles by 60 percent. Vitamin D is protective against viral illness. And numerous authors and studies have shown the damaging effects of chemical antipyretics (fever lowering drugs) on the natural course of disease – a practice still sadly in widespread use in America. Better understanding of disease mechanisms, utilizing nutritional support and better scientific care of the sick child are safer alternatives to widespread vaccination.

Perhaps one of the best perspectives on the whole vaccination paradigm is provided by Dr. Harold Buttram, M.D., FAACP:

As one of today’s senior citizens who grew up in a Midwestern state in the 1930s, and as a doctor who has treated many children, I may have a special vantage point of time and experience in regard to the changes that have taken place in the health of America’s children since the relatively innocent times of the 1930s. At summer camps in the New Mexico Mountains that I was fortunate to attend, no boy had allergies, none was on medication, and no boy was ever sick with the common ailments of today. It was much the same in schools. I don’t recall ever seeing a child with easily recognized behaviors now described as hyperactivity (ADHD) or autism.

Today in stark contrast, approximately one-third of our youngsters are afflicted with the 4-A Disorders (Autism, ADHD, Asthma, and Allergies), as described and documented by Dr. Kenneth Bock. School budgets are being strained to the breaking points in providing special education classes for autistic and learning disabled children. Allergy problems are proliferating, as indicated by long lines of children at school nursing stations for their noontime medications.

Could today’s infant and childhood vaccine programs, with their steadily increasing numbers of vaccines, be a contributory cause of this ominous health trend? As reflected in the U.S. Congressional Hearings (1999 to December 2004) on issues of vaccine safety, in which major deficiencies in vaccine safety testing were disclosed, it is a real possibility that vaccines may be one of the major, if not the major cause of this trend.

I, too, am old enough to remember these times. We are changing the pattern of disease, but not necessarily making our children nor ourselves healthier. We are converting benign childhood disease into more severe adult disease. Consider the chickenpox vaccine. We used to have chickenpox parties where small children were purposely exposed to kids sick with chickenpox. In those days, every mother or grandmother knew it was safer for toddlers to get the disease early and not wait until teenage years. Now we vaccinate, but of course that vaccine is only effective for 15-20 years, so now adults must constantly be revaccinated or run the risk of getting a life-threatening severe form of chickenpox. The shingles uptick is directly attributable to the lack of re-exposure of older people to the wild chickpox virus. But not to worry – the drug companies can sell us a shingles vaccine for a disease their previous vaccine created.

We have forgotten that for most normal children, childhood diseases are benign. As recounted about mumps in the Iowa Department of Public Health Manual, “it is more common in infants, children and young adults. Of people who are not immunized, >85 percent will have mumps by adulthood, but symptoms may have been mild and therefore not recognized.”

At the end of the day, the issue here is one of freedom, and freedom is the freedom to choose – even if we make a bad choice. The argument that I must vaccinate my children for the good of the community is not only scientifically questionable, it is an unethical precept. It is the argument all dictators and totalitarians have used. “Comrade, you must work tirelessly for the good of the collective. You must give up your money and property for the good of the collective, and now … you must allow us to inject your children with what we deem is good for the collective.” If American’s don’t stand up against this, then we are lost. Because we have lost ownership of ourselves. Our bodies are no longer solely ours – we and our children are able to be commandeered for the “greater good.”

Hits: 6927
Comments (7)add comment
0
comment
written by sdfsdfsdfsdfsdf , February 06, 2015

I think all of this debate ignores the real question: is it really about human life?

If it truly was about human life, then all I want to know is where are all the rabid liberals marching in lockstep to ban automobiles?? Does anyone have any idea how many get slaughtered every year in their cars? Just about everyone I know has been involved in a car accident or two. I myself have been involved in several throughout my life. I also know of one friend of my brothers almost killed in a crash and another friend of my brothers killed from a car crash. I know of no one dying from measles. So I ask again: where are the riots and fire bombing of car dealerships? Where are the screams for NATO to bomb car factories lest another hapless teenager commit suicide trying to impress a girl in his brand new car? Why is it that a story about an entire family annihilated on the road on the way to disney world is just a foot note in an article and not discussed on national media? I mean if its about human life, we need to forcibly return everyone to an Amish lifestyle or make manadatory breath alyzers before getting into a car.

So, let me try to understand this. We accept vehicle death and devestation in return for not having to live like the Amish. We accept this as necessary for modern society. Why can't we accept a virus that kills a very small handful of people? Why can't we accept that if we go to Disney World there is a slight chance a nasty bug goes around? By the way, have there been any fatalities resulting from the Disney World measles scare?

If the government had proven itself to be completely trustworthy, then maybe I would be ok with mandatory vaccinations. But that is far from the case.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +10

0
unaccountable
written by iwitness02 , February 06, 2015

If you can sell a shot, vaccine, for twenty five bucks, to every American that adds up to real money. Good business. So many of the bills we pay are mandated by law. This whole make money off the tax payer thing is a good gig if you can into it. Of course this discounts the human suffering in pursuit of a buck. To many are to eager to get rich on the backs of others. Selfishness reigns supreme. There are rumors that people are getting tired of being bullied by the unaccountable.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +8

0
Gov. Chris Christie is a Freemason
written by Alex C , February 06, 2015

Be very very careful of this Chris Christie guy...He is just a controlled opposition. Please research on people who seem to support truth movements.

This how it goes as we have seen countless times before.

They will soon take down his credibility with some pictures, videos, money scams, pornography etc with that they will link this story and say...look those who believes in non-vaccination is Evil Psychopaths....we are the good guy so take vaccinations.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +1

Brandon Smith
...
written by Brandon Smith , February 07, 2015

@Alex

I think the vaccine issue far surpasses the public notoriety of Chris Christie. Anti-vaccine groups have made incredible strides without him, and no amount of bad press is going to change their momentum.

Did Rand Paul's sellout to Romney and the Neo-Cons in 2012 change ANYTHING in the liberty movement? Nope. The movement only continued to grow. I hope the elites really do believe that Chris Christie matters at all in the vaccine fight. Let them waste their energies further on pointless psy-ops.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +6

0
...
written by Implied Violins , February 07, 2015

As a biologist trained by 'the system' it took a lot to convince me that vaccines aren't what they have been touted to be, but now I'm solidly on the other side of the fence. This is a great article, one that I will forward to other scientists to at least get them to hear my side of the argument. I am also seeing a lot more non-biased scientific studies about adverse effects of vaccines in the literature lately, so maybe the worm IS turning.

Unfortunately, I work in the government sector and there is talk now of mandatory vaccination for Ebola if that vaccine passes trials (the new one, not the one they supposedly produced in 2006 which was hushed up by the media), as we work with a lot of biological material and our 'leaders' want to cover their asses over liability issues...as if the vaccines won't cause MORE damage than Ebola! (which is actually far harder to contract and much easier to treat than most people have been lead to believe)

If and when that happens, THAT is the day I 'bug out!'

Thanks for posting this article, and I'll be spreading it far and wide.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +1

0
Careful what you blame
written by BacktoBasics , February 08, 2015

I thought this was a very well written and informative article, though the idea that the introduction of vaccines could be the sole cause of the changes in children's health between the 1930s and now fails to consider other changes in society that have occurred over that period.

Since the 1930s there have been significant changes to peoples diet stemming from the introduction and consumption of highly processed foods. There are some excellent studies out there that demonstrate that children eating healthy (organic) home-cooked meals have a much lower incidence of many now common aliments, e.g. Asthma & peanut allergies.

Also since the 1930s there has been the introduction of television, which is now commonly watched by young children, under 5 yrs old. It has been clearly documented that when young developing brains are exposed to visual inputs with a high change frequency (i.e. quick changes in camera angle - particularly common in "Action" cartoons) their brains develop to expect this high level of visual stimulation, which then translates into an inability to concentrate and hyperactivity as the child grows, which is then diagnosed as ADHD.

So while I do not support forced vaccinations I am also of the view that if you use the TV set as a babysitter and feed your children Macdonalds and Coke because cooking something healthy from raw ingredients is too tough, you will certainly reap what you have sewn as far as the health of your children is concerned.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +2

0
not quite strong enough
written by Steve B. , February 10, 2015

The article is good...as far as it goes. But the vaccine issue is worse, far worse. From Gary Null and Richard Gale:

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-mccarthyism-did-2014-mark-collapse-vaccine-establishment

Many others have weighed in, including Suzanne Humphries. E.g., at her site:

http://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/

Check also Russell Blaylock, Catherine Frompovich and Sheri Tenpenny. Vaccination is a fraud and a terrible one at that, because it wrecks the human body.

Now comes Judy Mikovits, a lifer at the corrupt NCI, who while not giving up on vaccines (rather amazing, imo), openly says they can and do trigger a newly discovered and normally dormant non-HIV communicable retrovirus she discovered lurking in many Americans already. Check a couple of the reviews, especially the one which says that at best this will be the worst epidemic known to mankind and at worst a human extinction event. Which is not far from where the NWO wants to take us, transhuman survivors notwithstanding.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1626365652/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Mikovits has given interviews which can be found on the web.

End game has truly arrived, folks. Of course, vaccines are just one facet of the weapons array.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0


Write comment
smaller | bigger
 

busy