The best position for a tyrant or tyrants to be in, at least while consolidating power, is tyranny by proxy. That is to say, the most dangerous tyrants are those the people do not recognize: the tyrants who hide behind scarecrows and puppets and faceless organizations. The worst position for the common citizen to be in is a false sense of security and understanding, operating on the assumption that tyrants do not exist or that potential tyrants are really just greedy fools acting independently from one another.
Sadly, there are a great many people today who hold naïve notions that our sociopolitical dynamic is driven by random chaos, greed and fear. I’m sorry to say that this is simply not so, and anyone who believes such nonsense is doomed to be victimized by the tides of history over and over again.
There is nothing random or coincidental about our political systems or economic structures. There are no isolated tyrants and high-level criminals functioning solely on greed and ignorance. And while there is certainly chaos, this chaos is invariably engineered, not accidental. These crisis events are created by people who often refer to themselves as “globalists” or “internationalists,” and their goals are rather obvious and sometimes openly admitted: at the top of their list is the complete centralization of government and economic power that is then ACCEPTED by the people as preferable. They hope to attain this goal primarily through the exploitation of puppet politicians around the world as well as the use of pervasive banking institutions as weapons of mass fiscal destruction.
Their strategic history is awash in wars and financial disasters, and not because they are incompetent. They are evil, not stupid.
By extension, perhaps the most dangerous lie circulating today is that central banks are chaotic operations run by intellectual idiots who have no clue what they are doing. This is nonsense. While the ideological cultism of elitism and globalism is ignorant and monstrous at its core, these people function rather successfully through highly organized collusion. Their principles are subhuman, but their strategies are invasive and intelligent.
That’s right; there is a conspiracy afoot, and this conspiracy requires created destruction as cover and concealment. Central banks and the private bankers who run them work together regardless of national affiliations to achieve certain objectives, and they all serve a greater agenda. If you would like to learn more about the details behind what motivates globalists, at least in the financial sense, read my article 'The Economic Endgame Explained.'
Many people, including insiders, have written extensively about central banks and their true intentions to centralize and rule the masses through manipulation, if not direct political domination. I think Carroll Quigley, Council on Foreign Relations insider and mentor to Bill Clinton, presents the reality of our situation quite clearly in his book “Tragedy And Hope”:
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank … sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
This "world system of financial control" that Quigley speaks of has not yet been achieved, but the globalists have been working tirelessly towards such a goal. The plan for a single global currency system and a single global economic authority is outlined rather blatantly in an article published in the Rothschild owned 'The Economist' entitled 'Get Ready For A Global Currency By 2018'. This article was written in 1988, and much of the process of globalization it describes is already well underway. It is a plan that is at least decades in the making. Again, it is foolhardy to assume central banks and international bankers are a bunch of clumsy Mr. Magoos unwittingly driving our economy off a cliff; they know EXACTLY what they are doing.
Being the clever tyrants that they are, the members of the central banking cult hope you are too stupid or too biased to grasp the concept of conspiracy. They prefer that you see them as bumbling idiots, as children who found their father’s shotgun or who like to play with matches because in your assumptions and underestimations they find safety. If you cannot identify the agenda, you can do nothing to interfere with the agenda.
I have found that the false notion of central bank impotence is growing in popularity lately, certainly in light of the recent Fed decision to delay an interest rate hike in September. With that particular event in mind, let’s explore what is really going on and why the central banks are far more dangerous and deliberate than people are giving them credit for.
The argument that the Federal Reserve is now “between a rock and a hard place” keeps popping up in alternative media circles lately, but I find this depiction to be inaccurate. It presumes that the Federal Reserve "wants" to save the U.S. economy or at least wants to maintain our status quo as the “golden goose.” This is not the case. America is not the golden goose. In truth, the Fed is exactly where it wants to be; and it is the American people who are trapped economically rather than the bankers.
Take, for instance, the original Fed push for the taper of quantitative easing; why did the Fed pursue this in the first place? QE and zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) are the two pillars holding up U.S. equities markets and U.S. bonds. No one in the mainstream was demanding that the Fed enact taper measures. And when the Fed more publicly introduced the potential for such measures in the fall of 2013, no one believed it would actually follow through. Why? Because removing a primary support pillar from under the “golden goose” seemed incomprehensible to them.
In September of that year, I argued that the Fed would indeed taper QE. And, in my article “Is The Fed Ready To Cut America’s Fiat Life Support?” I gave my reasons why. In short, I felt the Fed was preparing for the final collapse of our economic system and the taper acted as a kind of control valve, making a path for the next leg down without immediate destabilization. I also argued that all stimulus measures have a shelf life, and the shelf life for all QE and ZIRP is quickly coming to an end. They no longer serve a purpose except to marginally slow the collapse of certain sectors, so the Fed is systematically dismantling them.
I received numerous emails, some civil and some hostile, as to why I was crazy to think the Fed would ever end QE. I knew the taper would be instituted because I was willing to accept the real motivation of central banks, which is to undermine and destroy economies within a particular time frame, not secure economies or kick the can indefinitely. In light of this, the taper made sense. One great pillar is gone, and now only ZIRP remains.
After a couple of meetings and preplanned delays, the Fed did indeed follow through with the taper in December of that year. In response, energy markets essentially imploded and stocks became steadily more volatile over the course of 2014, leading to a near 10% drop in early fall followed by foreign QE efforts and false hints of QE4 by Fed officials as central banks slowed the crisis to an easier to manage pace while easing the investment world into the idea of reduced stimulus policies and reduced living standards; what some call the "new normal".
I have held that the Fed is likely following the same exact model with ZIRP, delaying through the fall only to remove the final pillar in December.
For now, the Fed is being portrayed as incompetent with markets behaving erratically as investors lose faith in their high priests. This is exactly what the bankers that control the Fed prefer. Better to be seen as incompetent than to be seen as deliberately insidious. And who knows, maybe a convenient disaster event in the meantime such as a terrorist attack or war (Syria) could be used to draw attention away from the bankers completely.
Strangely, Bloomberg seems to agree (at least in part) with my view that the taper model is being copied for use in the rate hike theater and that a hike is coming in December.
Meanwhile, some Federal Reserve officials once again insinuate that a hike will be implemented by the end of the year while others hint at the opposite.
Other mainstream sources are stating the contrary, with Pimco arguing that there will be no Fed rate hike until 2016. Of course, Pimco made a similar claim back in 2013 against any chance of a QE taper. They were wrong, or, they were deliberately misleading investors.
Goldman Sachs is also redrafting their predictions and indicating that a Fed rate hike will not come until mid-2016. With evidence indicating that Goldman Sachs holds considerable influence over Fed policy (such as exposed private meetings on policy between Fed officials and banking CEO's), one might argue that whatever they “predict” for the rate hike will ultimately happen. However, I would point out that if Goldman Sachs is indeed on the inside of Fed policy making, then they are often prone to lying about it or hiding it.
During the taper fiasco in 2013, Goldman Sachs first claimed that the Fed would taper in September. They lost billions of dollars on bad currency bets as the Fed delayed.
Then, Goldman Sachs argued that there would be no taper in December of that year; and they were proven to be wrong (or disingenuous) once again.
Today, with the interest rate fiasco, Goldman Sachs claimed a Fed rate hike would likely take place in September. They were wrong. Now, once again, they are claiming no rate hike until next year.
Are we beginning to see a pattern here?
How could an elitist-run bank with proven inside connections to the Federal Reserve be so wrong so often about Fed policy changes? Well, losing a billion dollars here and there is not a very big deal to Goldman Sachs. I believe they are far more interested in misleading investors and keeping the public off guard, and are willing to sacrifice some nominal profits in the process. Remember, these are the same guys who conned nations like Greece into buying toxic derivatives that Goldman was simultaneously betting against!
The relationship between international banks like Goldman Sachs and central banks like the Federal Reserve is best summed up in yet another Carroll Quigley quote from “Tragedy And Hope”:
"It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks."
Goldman Sachs and other major banks act in concert with the Fed (or even dictate Fed actions) in conditioning public psychology as much as they manipulate finance. First and foremost, globalists require confusion. Confusion is power. What better way to confuse and mislead the investment world than to place bad bets on Fed policy changes?
Heading into the end of 2015, we are only going to be faced with ever mounting mixed messages and confusion from the mainstream media, international banks and central banks. It is important to always remember, though, that this is by design. A common motto of the elite is “order out of chaos,” or “never let a good crisis go to waste.” Think critically about why the Fed has chosen to push forward with earth-shaking policy changes this year that no one asked for. What does it have to gain? And realize that if the real goal of the Fed is instability, then it has much to gain through its recent and seemingly insane actions.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by Pologrounds , September 23, 2015
The Federal Reserve Bank of the U.S. is beholden to the directive of the Bank for International Settlements. I don't agree with Carroll Quigley about the BIS being controlled by the central banks of the world. It's the other way around: the Federal Reserve Bank is a soldier of the BIS. The BIS allows the illusion of central bank power to be present in each respective country where one exists, but all the while it is the one shaping global policy through its board and henchmen (the IMF and World Bank). Monitor the pulse of the BIS and what it communicates, and one can then piece together the order out of the chaos.
written by 737 Capt. , September 23, 2015
So, when they raise interest rates in Dec. the stock market will crash. When peoples 401k's are losing money they will not spend money. For an economy that is driven 70% by consumption, the decrease in money being spent will collapse the economy. Then what is their plan? Have the government tell people that the it is ok to spend now because the dollar is now backed by the SDR? How does this look in everyday life in America? How will they get America to except this?
written by DRAKE , September 23, 2015
Lucifer created and controls the world system, Call it "Babylon". But Lucifer's head will soon be crushed. Much sooner than his little Globalist Banker concubines comprehend.
written by Brandon Smith , September 23, 2015
@737 Cap
Read my article 'The Economic End Game Explained' here:
http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2403-the-economic-end-game-explained
written by Brandon Smith , September 23, 2015
@Pologrounds
The BIS is actually composed of members of particular central banks as well as influenced by international banking CEOs. Read the article 'Ruling The World Of Money' published by Harpers Magazine:
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/moneyclub.htm
You will discover that all the same people or their minions tend to be members of various elitist organizations and these organizations tend to simply exist as front institutions.
written by clive m , September 23, 2015
Among some other interesting answers from this Q&A:
Claudio Borio (BIS Chief Economist) Says Global Central Bank is "Out of the Question"
http://lonestarwhitehouse.blogspot.com/2015/09/claudio-borio-bis-chief-economist-says.html
written by fodderwing , September 23, 2015
Ever notice that re-distributionist impulses of the powers that be are not so much the redistribution of money and property, but the redistribution of credit? That's how they've done it.
written by Brandon Smith , September 23, 2015
@Clive
The current head of the BIS would never openly admit to a plan for global economic governance, but the IMF does touch on the subject on occasion.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency
written by andysloan , September 23, 2015
A timely article Brandon.
In fact QE and ZIRP were inevitable to the series of designed crashes over several decades and represent the ultimate looting of the nations.
Free money created out of nothing is taken from the Central Banks and effectively transferred through the banking/investment complex to the super-wealthy. And this time when the "Elite" deliberately crash the system, whole economies will be bankrupted and private debt will be transferred to government.
As a result, government will substantively own production, distribution and exchange and hence Western societies will become communist.
In 45 seconds, Anthony Hilder precisely states the Elite's plans as follows;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIDWPiG3eMw&bpctr=1443051664
(1min 45s - 2 mins 30s)
We all need a dose of Mr Hilder's fighting spirit!
The Mother of God - Our Lady of Fatima, also foretold what is coming in 1917
"If my requests are not granted, Russia will spread her errors throughout the world, provoking wars and persecutions against the Church. Many good people will be martyred, there will come another great war, and various nations will be destroyed."
See
http://www.salvemariaregina.info/Message.html
God bless all!
written by clive m , September 23, 2015
@Brandon
Yes I agree, and was struck by his decisive language. Was also struck by the admission that "we don't understand inflation." They know what's coming. Chaotic inflation and deflation at the same time as the system breaks down.
written by turtlefeet , September 24, 2015
I wonder if those comments from Strauss Kahn were the ones that cost him his future...
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Turtlefeet
Highly doubtful. Lagarde has essentially called for the same thing only with more sterilized language. She uses terms like "global currency reset". Also, interestingly, after resigning from the IMF Kahn accepted a position on the Russian Regional Development Bank, further indicating a close relationship between IMF officials and Russia.
written by fr3ddy , September 24, 2015
Brandon, I respect your opinions and advice and I also respect this man's advice and opinions. He has an internet radio show on economics. I am not savvy enough in these matters to address his concerns - but perhaps you can? I forwarded your article to him just tonight and he replied to me thus.
Best,
Bob
"Hi, Bob,
This is all very interesting but he never deals with how he knows this to be true. It’s all a nice – and perfectly plausible – idea but if you are going to make these claims, you have to bolster your own credibility which he manifestly fails to do.
You really only have to listen to these clowns in press conferences to realize they don’t have a clue. OK, if what this guy says is true, you could presumably make the claim that ALL idiots are really geniuses who want you to think they’re dumb.
Why is this necessary? Why is it so much more plausible to believe that these numbskulls are engaged in a giant conspiracy rather than just mindless fools? To believe this, you have to believe a whole string of other really tortured arguments and in the end, the whole thing makes no sense. If it did, trust me, I would eagerly fall in line. I have no bias against the truth. But truly, Bob, none of it makes any sense…"
Regards,
Richard
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Bob
Apparently, your friend did not read the article or the numerous included links, or the quotes from Carroll Quigley, an elitist insider telling us DIRECTLY that there is indeed a conspiracy. I back everything I say with evidence because I HAVE TO. I would not be taken seriously as an economist and sociopolitical analyst otherwise.
There is nothing I can do to help your friend if he is so ignorant that he can't be bothered to look at the AMPLE evidence provided in the article. He doesn't even state which part of the article he SPECIFICALLY disagrees with; he simply makes a broad brushed statement about how I "never deal with how I know this to be true". This is lazy generalization, not an intelligent viewpoint. Sadly, the art of critical thinking and logical debate is mostly lost.
Frankly, you are wasting your time on such people.
Regards,
Brandon Smith
written by James_Warden , September 24, 2015
Hi Brandon,
Very interesting view in your article. I am a layperson in these matters but have suspected for a long time that yes, our global "System" is feudal, nation states are vassal to an international hierarchy of bankers, whose layers are reminiscent of an onion ...
Your article makes me think about Fight Club and the concept of "controlled demolition", but designed by actors far different in nature than those in this movie.
My question is: if I take this view as a reflection of the truth, what can I, a layperson, do ? How does knowing this help me in any way ? Spreading the word is one thing, but my relatives and circles of friends are all like me, middle class folks dealing with immediate stuff (kids schooling, daily jobs, bills to pay, etc). We are all caught in the flow of daily practical things while these systemic plots are implemented and downstream effects are felt only after a while via bubbles and crashes, diverting us from the root-causes. So, what can one do ? What do you do against this save for publishing your analyses ?
Thanks for feedback,
J.
written by Federico Nicola , September 24, 2015
@Brandon,
we agree wholeheartedly on the globalist agenda behind the scenes. It's pretty obvious to any intuitive mind that dares to go behind the PR lines and connect the dots.
Yet, when you claim "They are evil, not stupid", you give a moral judgement, implying that the globalist agenda towards a world central power is wrong, is driven primarily by their greed and that of course we would be better off without it.
Recently I stumbled upon the works of Mr. Galalae on depopulation and had a chat with him. His thesis is that since 1945 the allied powers realized that the only way to prevent a new world war was by stopping population growth. This was not and still isn't an easily achievable goal. In the way were social institutions, cultural traditions and religious beliefs. To reach consensus and implement a worldwide policy of "controlled demographic transition" we needed a transnational world authority. The UN was formed primarily to implement this agenda. In countries like China and India the objectives were pursued openly through legislation, while in Christian countries the moral opposition to such measures led to a covert depopulation programs targeting human fertility through bio-chemical poisoning. (http://objects.liquidweb.servi...tion/Peace Without Poison.pdf)
His argument is thus that the globalist policy is based on good intentions, and that in fact was able to slow down the demographic explosion enabling material prosperity to many while avoiding (for now) a nuclear war over resources.
Of course he argues that the covert methods employed are subhuman and have created new problems, such as social, cultural and biological degradation to the extent of an unprecedented, world-scale human genocide.
Monetary policy is the coercive tool used by the elite to push their agenda aiming to gradually dismantle the national sovereign states and redistribute capital around the globe.
And while he calls for abandoning this covert methods with a new world system based on informed consent and transparency, he still advocates for the creation of a global authority to deal with the urgent sustainability issues such as population, wealth distribution and natural resource use, which can't be addressed by national scale power institutions that prioritize their particular interest.
I think this is a reasonable analysis. What do you think?
written by Federico Nicola , September 24, 2015
1. Killing Us Softly: Causes and Consequences of the Global Depopulation Policy (book, 110 pages)
http://real-agenda.com/wp-cont...FTLY2.pdf
2. Methods of Depopulation (video, 25 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hj3LGvWWLU
3. Phases of Depopulation (video, 6 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9nsFFZon1E
4. Peace Without Poison (book of evidence, 1040 pages
http://objects.liquidweb.services/depopulation/Peace Without Poison.pdf
5. Survival or Extinction (book of solutions, 216 pages)
http://objects.liquidweb.services/depopulation/SURVIVAL OR EXTINCTION.pdf
6. The Future of Global Governance (roadmap book, 90 pages)
https://www.scribd.com/doc/277116203/The-Future-of-Global-Governance
written by andysloan , September 24, 2015
Bob,
You can send you friend this testimony of Congressman Louis McFadden
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html
God bless!
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Fredrico
The road to hell is paved with so-called "good intentions".
The elites are occultists, not good samaritans. They dance around a friggin' stone owl at Bohemian Grove representing Molech, the god of death and destruction and the eater of children. If they are so concerned with "overpopulation" then why don't they set an example and start killing themselves in the name of "sustainability"?
I'm sorry, but NO ONE has the right to systematically cull the population. That's God's domain (or nature's, depending on what you subscribe to), not ours.
Beyond that, overpopulation is not a threat and will not be for many generations to come. With current technologies, let alone future technologies, resource allocation is completely unnecessary and a lie that socialist/communists use to falsely justify greater government power. We have the ability to supply food, water, shelter and free energy to every person on the planet without issue. It is the ELITES that have created artificial resource scarcity in order to control the people.
In the event of so-called "overpopulation", people also seem to forget that human beings have a tendency to innovate and adapt technology to overcome obstacles to better living standards. Greater population is a driver of greater innovation, allowing for even more efficient resource usage.
I find the ego involved in any attempt to elevate one's self as some kind of "philosopher king" rather abhorrent. Any agenda that calls for centralized global governance, depopulation, and scientific tyranny is EVIL by any standard of inherent conscience regardless of what "good intentions" the men behind it claim to have, and I will personally work to annihilate such a group of men for my OWN safety and the safety of those I care for, let alone the safety of the world.
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@James
Read my article 'Non-Participation And Decentralization As Primers For Revolution':
http://www.alt-market.com/articles/1990-non-participation-and-decentralization-as-primers-for-revolution
written by andysloan , September 24, 2015
http://www.henrymakow.com/fath...the_m.html
Famous sermon here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGBnEvpCbso
WOULD STRONGLY ADVISE EVERYONE TO WATCH THIS!
written by andysloan , September 24, 2015
Federico;
Take a look up in the sky tonight!
Job 36:25
"All men see Him, every one beholdeth afar off."
And understand Who is in control!
Acts of the Apostles 17:24-27
"God, who made the world, and all things therein; he, being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is he served with men' s hands, as though he needed any thing; seeing it is he who giveth to all life, and breath, and all things:
Dwelleth not in temples: God is not contained in temples; so as to need them for his dwelling, or any other uses, as the heathens imagined. Yet by his omnipresence, he is both there and everywhere.
And hath made of one, all mankind, to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, DETERMINING APPOINTED TIMES AND THE LIMITS OF THEIR HABITATION That they should seek God, if happily they may feel after him or find him, although he be not far from every one of us: "
To suggest that people be limited to having 2 children, is a serious violation of personal right and just look at China to see what "Tyranny of Centralization" would be necessary to police such a horrific proposal.
It is also sinful, being contrary to the command of our Creator;
Genesis 1:27-28
"And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it,"
If you want to know your God - pray to Him;
Matthew 7:7-8
"Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you. For every one that asketh, receiveth: and he that seeketh, findeth: and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened."
God bless!
written by fr3ddy , September 24, 2015
His reactions to the faction group's on the right (Birch Society etc.) claims that Tragedy and Hope describes a grand conspiracy indicates that he is denying it. He says that his writings have been taken out of context and that he himself is not an 'insider'.
http://www.carrollquigley.net/biography.htm
So, I have to back off just a bit on the big conspiracy until more evidence is presented to me as I look. Not to say that there is no conspiracy toward global government and control, just that I will proceed more cautiously when taking in information from people not directly associated with the conspirators.
written by fr3ddy , September 24, 2015
And he clearly agrees that there is a concerted effort towards global feudalism... so I remain encamped with those who see this global power grab happening. Just not sure that Quigley meant what people say he meant in his writings...
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/09/20/the-pope-appeareth/
written by andysloan , September 24, 2015
To fr3ddy;
You can start here for free (Pages 61-64);
Satan - Prince of this World by William Guy Carr, R.D.
Commander R.C.N. (R)
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Books, Tracts & Preaching/Printed Books/satan_prince_of_this_world.pdf
and here;
http://www.globalistagenda.org/quotes.htm
And first-hand testimony here;
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” - David Rockefeller, Memoirs (2002), page 405
Second-hand testimony here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuinaIm-kd4
As for Carroll Quigley's writings, whatever he or anyone else may or may not have said later, his writings bear testimony to a massive conspiracy, which he stated that as a historian considered he was duty bound to record. He himself gave testimony that his book Tragedy and Hope "was suppressed and the market plan undermined"; see
http://www.tragedyandhope.com/which-versions-of-tragedy-and-hope-are-the-uncensored-editions/
God bless!
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Freddy
Quigley's book was almost completely blocked from publication which was why he tried to distance himself from his own admissions. Quigley also had full access to the PRIVATE Rockefeller archives during his work on the book, something only an insider would ever receive. Beyond that, this quote negates any dismissals by Quigley:
”There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act.
In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.
I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records.
I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments.”
- From Tragedy And Hope, pg 950
written by 2938 , September 24, 2015
Inflation of the "paper money is worthless too much around, give me anything but" is on the horizon, not the "too much demand and not enough product so lets raise our prices because we can" variety.
Get right with God. 100 years happens to all of us.
John 3:16
written by TonyA , September 24, 2015
I believe in the end times, Armageddon at some point, and then the second coming....and I don't think it will all be brought about by a bunch of Magoos bumbling into it. There is certainly one evil master plan and one master planner. But I am trying to overlay your theories to what I see and read for myself is true NOW. That said, I have a few questions.
Given that 'they are evil, not stupid', and that evil people by definition don't have the character traits necessary to work together as a team for very long to maintain a 'single world' anything, have they just not thought that part of this through? After they subdue the world won't they go after each other?
Also, one or two of your points use faulty reasoning, not that they are still not likely true, but it detracts from your otherwise solid argument. Several times you offer us only two choices: either they really want to save the economy (implying that they are at least quasi good) but are incompetent, or they are evil and are intentionally destroying the economy. There are other possibilities, say, they are indeed evil but could care less what happens to the economy, so long as they maintain power (and money) long enough to position the police state to suppress the inevitable anarchy when the market finally wrests control and the SHTF. Impose martial law. Suspend elections and the constitution. This is plenty evil and plenty genius to pull it off.
I guess I can't image an evil genius willing to share power with others, and so maybe the evil plan is less ambitious than you argue.
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Tony
Your premise is based on a faulty conclusion. Evil people work together ALL THE TIME, as long as there is mutual gain involved. History is rife with the collusion of evil people doing evil things for LONG periods of time. It is the good people that have a real hard time getting their shit together. That's why successful revolutions for freedom are so rare.
Also, your point makes no sense given the evidence presented in the article, and then you follow it up with a meaningless hypothetical. The elites ADMIT openly to conspiracy and collusion. And, every single Federal Reserve action since its establishment in 1913 has led to the systematic destruction of our economy and our currency. Not only this, but they have openly admitted to the plan to replace our current structure with a global currency system and global economic governance. Logically, martial law would be an extension of a system that a certain percentage of the population will inevitably fight against. So, I'm not sure where you get the idea that the fault is mine. The fault is in the fact that you failed to examine the ample evidence provided.
written by TonyA , September 24, 2015
Okay. Let's say you are correct. Who is really pulling the strings for the Fed? Its certainly not Obama or that (actual) idiot Yellen (you do admit there are some idiot tools-- besides the American public-- in the mix here?). Who told the Fed what to and what not to do? Name names. And what role do prominent economists like Krugman play? Are they in on it, or also only duped? Is it coincidence that Fed policy appears to follow Keynesian principles by the book? Or was Keynes himself part of the conspiracy?
I am not mocking you. I really want to know these things.
written by Brandon Smith , September 24, 2015
@Tony
Again, you seem to be having some reading comprehension issues. Carroll Quigley, an elitist insider, clearly states that it is the BIS, led in part by the largest international banks, that dictates Fed policy. Also, you failed to read the Harpers article I linked above. Look up the heads of the BIS, the IMF, as well as organizations like the CFR, Tavistock, and the Bilderberg Group and there you have your primary culprits.
I do not have the time nor the inclination to do your research for you, but I can give you a list of well researched books to get you started, including:
The Creature From Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution - Antony Sutton
Wall Street And The Rise Of The Third Reich - Antony Sutton
Tragedy And Hope - Carroll Quigley
The New World Order - H.G. Welles (non-fiction)
There is a good place to start. Of course there are useful idiots that serve the elites. I never claimed there wasn't. My assertion given the EVIDENCE is that at the top of the pyramid there is indeed a PROVEN conspiracy. Do yourself a favor and engage in some real research if you truly want to know more.
written by Stevepidge , September 25, 2015
We are riding the sine wave of life. However, intelligence has afforded us as a species the ability to dramatically affect the natural course of the modulation of that wave. Someone is riding that wave and sustaining this growth, and that someone is the human species in general. However, like making sense of an ever descending Mandelbrot set, life has become too complicated.
We fight not against specific individual interests but against the forces of nature itself, our own corruption or fallibility in adequately managing the power that Prometheus bequeathed us. She calls her due, the fire of intelligence is raging. The internet is humanity's greatest tool ever made and we will either crash this wave function and return to literally less complicated times, if we survive the fall that is. Or we try and focus this fire of intelligence and truly release the power the internet is affording us.
Either choice is sufficient, I do not think there is a right course for humanity, there is only our course. One thing is for certain, we must act, or the fire that animates life will depart from us on this material plane.
written by Brandon Smith , September 25, 2015
@Stevepidge
I'm sorry, but complexity is not the problem. The problem is OVERSIMPLIFICATION. What we face as a species is an engineered action towards total centralization; in other words, forced simplification. The elites want one currency, one government, one society that follows one law - their law of moral relativism.
Humanity is meant to create complex systems, individuated systems based on imagination, ingenuity, and guided by truth. The internet represents, in part, that ideal. However, the internet can be disrupted by the elites through pre-staged kill switches just like our economy. The internet will not save us; we will save ourselves.
The lie of over-complexity is exactly what the elites would like us to believe, so that we can be sold on the idea of centralization. And make no mistake, the greater threat is NOT human nature. The greater threat is those select few globalists who have chosen to abandon human nature, human conscience, and human compassion for their own desires of power and godhood. THEY are the threat, and once their manipulations and environment of fear are removed, you will see the true potential for good that individuals have within them on a much larger scale.
written by James_Warden , September 25, 2015
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for the link about non-participation. In a way, I started this a long time ago at my own pace. So I see that this principle is the tool. Good because I could not think about something else.
Cheers!
written by Walt D , September 25, 2015
Don't forget, the government already has a plan to help "rescue" boomers and other's retirement plans that crash and are cut in half. They've already devised a plan to move investors into and "make them whole" after the next crash.
Of course the plan is controlled by the Federal government and has a few "safeguards" that commercial plans don't offer; limited investment choices, guarantees, the inability to lump sum out of the plan-you can only get your money on a monthly basis over a long term like an annuity or Social Security. This will facilitate the transfer of trillions in privately owned money into the hands of the Federal government, just when they need it most.
written by Guest , September 28, 2015
Brandon,
I have read almost all of your articles on the economy. I have to expand the screen to 175%, and sometimes have to go back a read a sentence again because you are using the acronym and I couldn't remember what it stood for, so reading your articles is not an easy task. But always worth it! But the answer you gave above that started...
"The road to hell is paved with so-called "good intentions".
The elites are occultists, not good samaritans. They dance around a friggin' stone owl at Bohemian Grove representing Molech, the god of death and destruction and the eater of children. If they are so concerned with "overpopulation" then why don't they set an example and start killing themselves in the name of "sustainability"? "
Knocked my respect for you out of the park! How true this was and a clear defense against the abject desolation of these souls/demons. Completely given over to satan. If I could have continued to give you points...I'd click for days! Kudos!
written by Keith Richard , October 03, 2015
To begin with it is probably effective for the conversation to provide some perspective. While it is debatable, who said what and who did what at the current time line, typical under a controlled and contrived media distribution system, one must consider that during the civil war, President Lincoln was quoted saying in essence "he was more concerned about the international bankers behind him than the canons before him". Now to put further perspective is to understand the furor the British Empire felt after loosing the War of Independence. In the London newspapers was published claims of intense revenge and desire to wreck the foundation of our construct. The elements for this hatred and resentment formulated several conspiracies and divergent tactics, deployed, to undermine our country and most openly our financial system. Remote taxation to the Crown, and divided loyalties prompted treasonous activities, all brought to bear during the civil war. Unknown to most is the fact that the Czar of Russia provided the Baltic fleet at Lincolns disposal and that Russian vessels were the only Navy vessels in San Francisco's harbor providing protection with orders from the Czar of Russia to protect against any attacks. Imagine that !!! Considering how close the British and French were in coming to the aid of the South (confederacy)in an attempt to derail the North (Union) and in turn guaranteeing them footholds in the country. The only factor that stopped them was Russia and the already expressed military support of the North and more notable the Czar's loyalty to President Lincoln.
By the time the 20th century rolled around we were introduced to the effects of the gambit the international bankers had in store for us. Things like the great depression, black-mailing sitting presidents, forcing the removal of the gold standard. the introduction of fiat currency and then the wars. The first world war was completely contrived. The second was even more grossly contrived. While it appeared a surprise attack in Hawaii in fact the right people were aware and craftily, with all three carrier groups in port amazingly all the carriers were no where near. So the only ships and men that were sacrificed to trip the "war switch" in this country, were all on converted WW1 vessels. Certainty worth replacing, too bad for the men. But forensic studies have shown many instances of open communications among the leaders of our military, and government showing they were completely aware the Japanese were going to attack. I do not believe in circumstance and all this serves the perspective issue I raised in the opening. All the things that happen that either carry huge unexplained issues and or problems, are all part of the fabric of manipulation that have resulted in a Federal Reserve that is held in ownership by foreign nationals, international banker families, including heirs from the third Reich from Nazi Germany in WW 2. The massive theft of confiscated wealth that the Catholic church enabled and even housed in secret were all pointing to another huge element of something that makes no sense. Why would the Catholic church risk such exposure. Ever hear of the catacombs under the cathedral in Italy where hundreds of baby skeletons were found. The current day fiasco Priests violating children sexually. This all fits an overall truth that the author of this blog originally stated that deception is the best camouflage. Corruption that boggles the mind as we have seen with our current President whose documentation was not authentic enough to get a job with the Los Angeles Police Department as I had. The warnings given me when I applied were, if you have any irregularities in your past or paperwork, you can and most certainly you would end up with criminal prosecution and penalties as a minimum consequence. The indifference to the Constitution by a president specifically educated in that document who violates it at will with no fear of consequence while Eric Holder had the controlling vote of who and what the Justice Department prosecuted. Nuns defying the health care bill mandate to violate their faith, or city officials in Arizona enforcing immigration laws the Immigration services were instructed to ignore by President Obama, were worthy prosecutions. Yet the great swindle of 1 billion plus dollars for a website that did not work only to pay additional hundreds of millions to fix it all paid to that same foreign company with past legal ties to Michelle Obama's legal friends. Or the swindle of hundreds of millions of dollars in the Solindra Solar case that had multi million dollar attorney fees being paid again to friends of Michelle Obama and past contributors to Obama's campaign. These overt, egregious acts of collusion and influence peddling, all that make no sense, because you and I look at all things with an eye on consequences and they clearly knew and know the system is and was completely rigged. I could go on but look at the Federal Reserve and its Share holders. The last I looked that information was still available to see. Perhaps I "runnith" over...hard to constrain myself. I feel desperate for my country and ever more I am aware of the huge swath of the population that is simply ignorant, and a second segment that believes in the Democrat Party line blindly and defend Obama tirelessly and a third segment, the disenfranchised, leave so few people left to take back control of our Government and our currency, among a backdrop of conspiracy and economic domination by non American, non Citizens who control our money and the Federal Reserve. In closing check out my website http://TheAltarofFreedom.com It is a heart felt project of mine still being developed, there is a section that offers a selection of famous quotes of our Founding Father Patriots. Interesting is the numbers of warnings opined about loosing control of our money and the dire warnings about international bankers and their efforts to undermine our country. The existence of the Federal Reserve and the IRS are subject proof of their handy-work regards Patriot Keith Richard
written by jeff 317 , October 07, 2015
It is the good people that have a real hard time getting their shit together. That's why successful revolutions for freedom are so rare.
This is a topic that is rarely discussed. Why would someone want to lead a revolution without the support that is needed? It is bad enough to challenge the psychopath's that would kill and extort without hesitation, but without the support of the majority that are suppressed, it is usually hopeless.
It seems to me that the majority are usually to lazy, apathetic, and ignorant to study the past, that show them that those that want to lead, almost always, want to extort and suppress as much as can be tolerated.
Brandon, maybe you could do an piece on how on those rare occasions, good people came out on top.
