Over the past year and a half, I have been writing on the engineered nature of ISIS, delving deeply into its history and its backing by Western intelligence agencies in articles such as “Is Martial Law Justified If ISIS Attacks?” as well as “What Will You Do When Tyranny And Terrorism Work Hand In Hand?” and “The Time Is Ripe For A False Flag Attack On American Soil.”
Specifically, I compared the ISIS phenomenon to another establishment-backed terrorist program that began at the onset of the Cold War in Europe and was publicly exposed in the 1990s. That program was called Operation Gladio.
Gladio involved the manipulation of existing extremist groups as well as the complete fabrication of terrorist cells within Europe claiming to be “left-wing.” The reality was that these terrorist cells were made up of intelligence agency operatives (including CIA operatives) acting as handlers often for duped scapegoats and patsies. These proxy terrorists initiated decades of attacks in Europe, which focused on shootings and bombings in public areas with full media saturation. Gladio-influenced cells, such as Action Directe, carried out at least 50 different violent attacks in France in the 1970s and 1980s, along with groups like Red Army Faction, Black September and the PLFP.
Governments across Europe began using the attacks as a rallying cry for a centralized one-European nation; that cry culminated in the formation of the EU.
Operation Gladio began in France in 1947, when French Interior Minister Edouard Depreux revealed the existence of a secret stay-behind army codenamed “Plan Bleu.”
In France in 1948, the Western Union Clandestine Committee (WUCC) was created to coordinate secret unorthodox warfare. After the creation of NATO a year later, the WUCC was integrated into the military alliance under the name Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC).
The former director of the French intelligence service DGSE, Adm. Pierre Lacoste, said in a 1992 interview with The Nation, that France’s “secret army” was involved in terrorist activities against Charles de Gaulle, whom the CIA wanted to assassinate.
De Gaulle was apparently not entirely innocent in the Gladio affair, either. De Gaulle was very familiar with a secret organization called Service d’ Action Civique. It ended up being exposed as a training ground for Gladio Agents under Jaques Foccart, a government “adviser” who would go on to mastermind multiple military coups in Africa. Whether de Gaulle was fully aware of this problem is not known. It was discovered, though, that SAC had infiltrated communist student groups in the late 1960s through the 1970s and attempted to provoke violent actions.
De Gaulle was eventually driven out of office after the 1969 failure of the Referendum of Regionalisation. He was replaced by Georges Pompidou, who (what a surprise) was an avid promoter of European unification (centralization). Pompidou founded the French arm of the Pan-European Union Movement. And immediately after he took de Gaulle’s position, he helped initiate the European Communities Summit, which led directly to the formation of the European Union structure.
Gladio was not fully exposed to the wider public until 1990 when Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti came forward to the senate with detailed information. After the information hit the mainstream, the European Parliament was forced to write a resolution against any future false flag projects. Clearly, they have since ignored these promises.
For more information on Gladio, I highly recommend the intensively researched book “NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe” by Daniele Ganser, as well as the 1992 BBC documentary “Operation Gladio.”
As I have stated time and time again, government engineered crisis is designed to do one thing: drive the fearful public toward more centralization and less freedom. Although Operation Gladio was later exposed, it was too late; Gladio (along with other clandestine economic measures) had achieved the goal of a malleable citizenry desperate for more centralized governance; a social attitude which led to a transnational union in Europe with a single currency mechanism.
What does this have to do with ISIS? In order to defeat an enemy, you have to know where he comes from, what his motivations are, and who pulls his strings if he has any. As I predicted in the pieces linked at the beginning of this article, ISIS has now been exposed as being supported if not entirely funded and managed by Western covert intelligence through documents obtained from the Department of Defense by Judicial Watch, making ISIS very similar to Gladio in its origins and tactics.
This DoD paper should not have been at all surprising to most of us in the liberty movement. The West had been shifting militants from Libya into Syria just before protests suddenly erupted into all-out war. Instructors from the U.K. and France, under U.S. advisement, had been training militants in Jordan specifically for the purpose of invading and disrupting Syria and overthrowing president Bashar Assad. This training continued well after it became clear that the same militants had formed under the banner of ISIS.
Establishment elites have openly applauded the radicalization of insurgents in Syria. The Council on Foreign Relations argued that the inclusion of what they called “extremist al-Qaida elements” in the Syrian insurgency “improved the moral” of the movement, stating that the “Free Syrian Army needs al-Qaida now.” The CFR acknowledges that the goal of al-Qaida operatives in Syria is not necessarily to overthrow Assad, but to establish an Islamic state. Despite this, the CFR continued to support the same strategy of militant training to overthrow Assad.
The facts are this:
- ISIS was created by covert intelligence and continues to be trained and supplied by Western governments.
- The tactics ISIS uses, including monstrous acts of genocide, were clearly taught to them by covert intelligence interests (look into the School of the Americas for similar programs), considering ISIS insurgents continue to receive aid from Western intelligence despite their behavior.
- Western governments are well aware that ISIS agents have been inserted into refugee camps and are being imported into Europe and the U.S.
- ISIS smugglers have openly admitted to this infiltration plan, yet the U.S. and EU governments continued the immigration surge.
- Lower echelon ISIS fighters that have actually been captured and interviewed apparently have wide-ranging views on Islam and are not the staunchly unified theocratic zealots the Western public has been led to believe. This is a considerable departure from groups like al-Qaida (also Western funded and trained), which required complete theological conformity.
In truth, the only unifying drive of many captured ISIS fighters has been a concerted hatred of the West and the U.S. in particular due to our government’s complete destabilization of the Middle East. Meaning, the establishment (globalists) brought chaos to the Middle East, then conjured the rise of ISIS out of that despair, then used ISIS to recruit young men with a hatred for the West, and has now led those fighters right to our doorstep.
The escalation of force in Syria by both Russia and the West is likely now useless, as thousands of ISIS insurgents have been removed from the combat zone and transported exactly where they prefer to be — right next door to us. But defeating ISIS has never been the goal.
One must conclude given these facts that the plan by the establishment to force public acceptance of Syrian mass immigration was a Trojan horse strategy to plant ISIS extremists within deadly proximity to western civilians. But why?
Again, this is yet another Gladio-style program designed to strike terror in the hearts of the public and condition them into accepting even greater centralization and less freedom. A European superstate with common border security and a single government authority will certainly be on the table soon. Not to mention, martial law is essentially in place in France today and will be expanded to other EU members as the attacks continue. As with Gladio, Europeans should expect many more events like the Paris attacks in the months to come.
The U.S. is set to receive over 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next couple months. Unlike in Europe, where numerous activist groups have been able to partially track numbers and types of people within refugee groups, Americans have little access to information surrounding Syrian immigration to the U.S. I suspect that, as in Europe, the claims that the refugees are only “single mothers, children and religious minorities” is mostly false, and many of them are actually single military-age males.
In the U.S., the federal government has been legally positioning for martial law for years, from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its indefinite-detention-without-trial provisions that apply to citizens, to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and mass surveillance measures without warrant, to resource confiscation provisions through executive order that apply during any event the White House labels an “emergency,” to elitist insiders like Wesley Clark planting the concept on national television of World War II-style internment camps for citizens deemed hostile to the status quo.
I would also point out that the U.S., and the global economy in general, is currently witnessing a massive slowdown rivaling the credit collapse of 2008. Widespread terrorist attacks are a perfect rationalization for a complete lockdown of Western peoples, as well as a perfect distraction from the banker-generated economic implosion that is progressing in exponentially harsher stages as we head into 2016.
Another major advantage to consider to the Paris attacks is that now, with a Syrian passport being conveniently found on one of the terrorists (possibly fake), the war in Syria is given greater rationale while the immigration plan continues unabated. NATO countries are gearing up for a large-scale assault in the region, while Russia is already entrenched. Imagine the potential for an “accidental” trigger event between the East and West as Russian troops and planes come within spitting distance of NATO troops and planes.
Americans should see a Paris-level attack as inevitable in the near term. They should expect similar events in unusual areas of the country, including more suburban and rural areas to ensure that no one feels safe anywhere. They should expect that said attacks will be high frequency and that they will occur in a coordinated manner. This is how Gladio operated, and this is undoubtedly how ISIS will operate.
The question is: What can be done about it?
We must first recognize that ISIS is only a surface problem; the deeper problem is corrupt governments across the globe creating dangerous terrorist groups out of thin air. That said, ISIS is still a threat, and must be dealt with along with globalists.
If the government insists upon financing and training dangerous militant groups and directly immigrating them along with Syrian refugees without any vetting whatsoever, if they insist on wide open borders, then there is not much we can do to prevent ISIS from slipping into the U.S. We also cannot go the fascist route and round up every Muslim in the name of security as some neocons are suggesting; this is exactly what the elites want, public support for liberty destroying measures against one group that can then be applied to ALL groups.
We can, though, take some measures that we should have been instituting all along.
Higher pressure on prime immigration centers: Legal immigration should not be an issue normally, but it has been made an issue due to deliberately lax security measures by the federal government. If the government is not going to take action, then the American people must. There are a limited number of these relocation centers in the U.S.; and activist pressure could be applied, along with pressure on local and state officials. Michigan, Texas and Alabama among other states have publicly announced that they will not be taking any more refugees until the government revises its vetting standards. That is a perfectly rational approach. Although I suspect the hour may be too late to disrupt the flow of ISIS sleeper cells into our country, we should do what we can to end the current insane immigration policies.
Locally managed border security: The federal border patrol simply is not getting the job done right now. And the great threat is that once an attack does occur within the U.S., the federal government will suggest a militarization of the border (or the entire nation) rather than taking simple measures they should have taken long ago. You see, the goal of false-flag terror is to motivate the public to demand more government power. This is why followers of the neoconservative mindset are idiotic. The establishment CREATED the problem of ISIS and potential ISIS immigration. And when it all goes sour, neocons cry out that the same government needs expanded militarized authority to do its job. I say, “No more.”
Border security should be handled at the local level rather than the federal level, meaning the people of the vulnerable states should be organizing their own security measure, patrols, alarms, response teams, etc. I am so tired of hearing that we should “let the professionals do the job.” Frankly, there are no “professionals” in the area of border security seeing as we now have wide-open borders. The locals have every right to secure their own states and will probably do a better job that the federal government ever has.
Your tactical response kit: Build an active-shooter kit for your vehicle and ALWAYS carry a sidearm, either open carry or concealed if you have a CCW. I open carry at all times as a matter of principle and have never been asked to leave an establishment as a result. But if you are worried about confrontation with people or businesses, then simply carry concealed. Open-carry citizens could dissuade attackers from striking a particular place altogether through blatant show of force, while CCW holders are less visible. There are advantages to both.
An active-shooter kit would require a lightweight folding-stock rifle or a short-barrel AR-style pistol with an arm brace, a lightweight tactical vest with mags and ammo, ballistic plates, smoke, a rifle light (for dark indoor spaces in particular; night vision with limited depth perception is far less effective than a simple light), a trauma kit with pressure bandages, celox gauze, tourniquets, chest seals, decompression needles, etc., as well as a radio communications kit. All gear should be tailored to the individual's expertise and needs. This kit should be placed in a nondescript backpack or carrying case for easy transport. Obviously, train with all of your gear extensively before using it in the field.
Personal and team training for active shooters: The only way Americans can guarantee any measure of safety from a Paris-style attack is for as many citizens as possible to be armed and trained. This means mentally training to go TOWARD the sound of the shooting, rather than to run away from it, as well as tactical methods to marginalize a shooter’s ability to move and project violence. Team training is a must, and you should already be working within a group to learn how to function in combat without danger of friendly fire or misdirected fire that might put innocent bystanders at risk.
The common argument against citizens defending themselves is that they are untrained and are “likely to do more harm than good.” This is nonsense. One armed person in Paris could have made all the difference, as this man armed with a .38 revolver did when his church in South Africa came under attack by terrorists. Another argument is that when armed citizens respond aggressively to an attack, they risk being mistaken as terrorists by authorities. I have to point out that the authorities rarely arrive in time to accomplish anything, let alone mistake you on the scene as a terrorist while defending yourself.
Military-grade training far superior to the training mandated by law enforcement is widely available to U.S. citizens. It is time to accept that this is the world we live in now. Are you going to put blind faith in a corrupt government system that has deliberately put you in harm’s way, or are you going to take proactive measures to protect yourself and those around you? Make no mistake; your safety is in your hands whether you like it or not.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by Alan Donelson , November 18, 2015
Brandon, thank you for yet another insightful, succinct, historically supported call to action -- with specifics! Reminds me of your earlier work through neithercorp.us!
Your post comes in tandem (temporally, at least) with the proposed "declaration of war" published on VeteransToday by Preston James and Mike Harris. They too prescribe taking action, albeit at a higher level of organization against what they term the "Rothschild Khazarian Mafia". "Act local, think global", comes to mind, quite the turnaround for that admonition! I appreciate your advice.
Thanks again!
written by filbert , November 18, 2015
How/Where does one obtain this training without ending up on a red list?
written by Pablo , November 18, 2015
"the global economy in general, is currently witnessing a massive slowdown rivaling the credit collapse of 2008"
If history is going to repeat, then we can expect a similar sell off during the last year of this two term prez, similar to the last year of the previous two term prez(bush 2007-2008) and Clinton (1999-2000)
IF you look at a 10 or 20 year chart of the US stock market, you can see a distinct pattern that occurs during the last year of each two term prez.
so, now you know, get out of the markets now, and starve the beast.
the corrupt govt is finance by corrupt bankers who know that greed, death, and destruction are profitable business, so take you money out, and don't let them use your money to do evil things
written by WarriorClass III , November 18, 2015
People must realize that it is the Federal Government that is the enemy of the people. The Globalists have completely taken over the government, using its power to implement these crimes against the people, and that ISIS is just another tool used against us.
And while we must protect ourselves against the ISIS terrorists, we must never forget who the real terrorists are - those in the Federal Government that have created them and brought them to our shores. Who created and voted for the Patriot Acts, the NDAA, and other freedom-destroying "laws" in our country? Who gave Obama "Fast-Track" Authority to implement the Republic-destroying "Trade Agreements? Who wants even more immigration in the US, in Both Parties, when 94,000,000 Americans are out of work?
Who put vote-rigging machines in YOUR district? It wasn't ISIS.
written by Diane D , November 18, 2015
Oath Keeper here. Thank you Brandon for the advice. WarriorClass III said it better than I could. Fox News, Republicans, the voting system etc. are managed to appear as 'choices and solutions'.
We are pretty much on our own. Pray for folks in the Liberty Movement who are in harm's crosshairs. Network locally as Brandon is teaching us. At this point, the only way out is through.
written by Brandon Smith , November 18, 2015
@filbert
I say, make the red list so long that it becomes useless by convincing most of the country to train.
written by CM Dutch , November 18, 2015
Without going into the moral and ethical issues, at what point does it become too late to take the offensive? It should be obvious to all but the most brain dead that “We the People“no longer have control of this country. With over 50% of the country now in the Dependent Category the Bondage phase is only years at the most away.
They have declared war on us, so the moral issue almost becomes mute at this point. The problem that I see would be hitting them hard all at once. Knock off 2-3 and they go into seclusion. I would speculate that they are already there. I also realize that they are waiting for any excuse to declare Martial Law. At this point it will get ugly, since they have not yet neutralized the 2nd. I see this as their biggest priority, getting rid of the 2nd.
written by GS , November 18, 2015
If Gladio was still in place, they might be the ones removing the jihadists and the globalists supporting them in Europe.
written by clive m , November 19, 2015
The script continues to come together. The US public has been predictively programmed for this for at least 15 years.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_ISLAMIC_STATE_CHEMICAL_WEAPONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-11-19-11-54-05
written by Tom Angle , November 19, 2015
I think you are leaving out a very important part of the equation. You just cannot ignore the 900 lb gorilla in the corner of the room bend on your destruction.
What you just stated the government is doing is treason. They are at war with the people and you cannot ignore that and survive. Treason has to be dealt with. Each and every one of them that came up with the idea of ISIS, wrote the plans for ISIS, trained ISIS supported ISIS, protected ISIS, transported ISIS and armed ISIS need to be tried for treason and when found guilty, hung. If this does not happen and the treason is allowed to go unfettered and/or unpunished, then liberty is lost.
written by Brandon Smith , November 19, 2015
@Tom Angle
How exactly did I ignore that obvious point, the entire article revolves around it:
"We must first recognize that ISIS is only a surface problem; the deeper problem is corrupt governments across the globe creating dangerous terrorist groups out of thin air. That said, ISIS is still a threat, and must be dealt with along with globalists."
You might want to read the article again.
written by Rasta Red , November 21, 2015
Another great article as usual Brandon. I need to know where my wife and I can get the tactical training you mention in your article. We live in Western New York State.
Thanks
Rasta Red
written by Brandon Smith , November 21, 2015
@Rasta Red
I've heard good things about MDTS Training, but have not attended any of their classes so I would do your research before paying any money. I would also look for any Oath Keeper CPT training in your area by contacting Oath Keepers.
There are a lot of tactical training courses in the state of New York, but some of them are for Law Enforcement and Military only. Like anything else, it takes a little time and research to find the right fit for you.
written by altarr , November 23, 2015
Isis is not the problem in the U.S it's the corrupt politition and those who are afraid of confrontation the lack of standing up to those in corrupt power have instilled fear deep within the people it's time to defend yourself stand by your rights they were put there for a reason use them by any means to protect yourself and others.
written by Greybeard , November 24, 2015
Been following your thoughts for awhile now ... well done.
I concur w/ the diagnosis, it's the prescription with which I struggle. Do we openly carry & boldly confront the oligarchs & numbed minions, or do we separate ourselves from mainstream culture, along the lines of the "Benedict Option" discussed in libertarian Christian circles?
There's a great deal of historical evidence that, when confronting a militarily powerful enemy, it is often preferable to prepare defenses, cultivate small/trusting community, and hang-on for the ride. At this point in American history, reformation just isn't possible IMO ... we're not going to turn the minds of the people subject to mainstream propaganda. Militarily preparations might revolve around guerrilla-type readiness, but my experience is that people seeking this option no nothing (nada, zip, ZERO) about COMSEC/OPSEC, which makes me want to run FAST in the opposite direction.
Maybe the answer depends on where one lives, the surrounding culture, and one's "season of life." As for me & my house we're working to preserve land/farm/independence, but doing that quietly & unobtrusively. Your essays promote these ideas as well ... thanks for helping pursue the "right" prescription that best honors God, in a land that is no longer "under God" or "indivisible."
written by 2 knives , November 25, 2015
Unless you identified as part of some alphabet (i.e. FBI, Local LEO, HLS, ect.) you will be shot as soon as you draw your weapon in an active shooter situation. Kill them all, let God sort them out thinking. Removing yourself from the action is "cowardly" but I would like to be a live coward rather a dead do-gooder. Live to fight another day in a scenario I choose. Read Lao Tsu for more details.
written by Brandon Smith , November 25, 2015
@2knives
Unfortunately, you are uneducated as to how active shooter events actually play out. Parisians had to wait 15 MINUTES or more in some cases for a police response to ISIS shooters; in the meantime, the terrorists had free reign to mow down as many unarmed civilians as they wanted. 15 minutes during a shooting event is an eternity.
Active shooter events in the U.S. play out EXACTLY the same way - in nearly every case, the police do not arrive in time to stop the killing, and often the shooter takes his own life rather than being shot by LEOs.
Yes, you are a coward, and you may or may not live another day. I for one will not stand back and watch as mass murderers shoot up innocent people including women and children in the ignorant hope that poorly trained local police will arrive in time and actually know how to handle the situation (they won't).
Name ONE instance in which an armed civilian moving in defense against an active shooter was killed by police.
written by 2 knives , November 26, 2015
As I am uneducated please allow for my ignorance. If you read what I wrote, it was implied the police were already on scene hence the shot by the good guys. The active shooter in Idaho was such a case. Armed ex military cowards did not draw their legally owned weapons for fear of being shot. That was my reference. Many Leos have trouble identifying the active shooters from civilians with firearms. My training says run, hide, or engage as the situation warrants in that order. This is not the movies as I am not Bruce Willis.
written by Brandon Smith , November 26, 2015
@2knives
Your statement is based on assumptions, assumptions which I addressed including the assumption that LEO's would BE ON THE SCENE. You suggested that people should run away from the action based on the assumption that Law Enforcement would already be there and would shoot them. Again, from my research there has NEVER been an incident in which a civilian moving to defend others against an active shooter has been engaged or killed by police. So, your theory is unwarranted and trite.
What you should have said (if you really mean what you claim to mean) is that in your opinion it is a bad idea to engage an active shooter at the same time as LEO's. Being that I NEVER suggested that people do such a thing, this argument would also be meaningless.
I think the problem you are suffering from is called the "armchair warrior complex" - having little or no experience or knowledge on a tactically inclined issue but feeling the irresistible urge to comment on it as if you do in a sad attempt to one-up someone who knows far more in a vain effort to assert your flailing manhood.
