Faith in an ideology based on a desire for power over others and the need to feel personally superior without any legitimate accomplishment is perhaps the most dangerous state of being an individual or society can adopt. I would refer to such a mindset as “zealotry,” an integral element of cultism and an extreme result of the elitist side of faith.
Zealotry and cultism are not limited to the realm of the religious. Zealotry is a clever devil hiding in the woodwork of any political or academic construct, and this includes the scientific community when it strays away from empirical logic and honest data into a world of pseudoscience and social engineering. I cannot think of a better example of zealotry feeding scientific cultism than the highly propagandized climate change/global warming movement.
Anthropogenic (man-made) global warming is quickly becoming the overarching rationale for almost every policy toward global centralization, as well as a scapegoat for nearly every major crisis from mass shootings and the rise of ISIS to geopolitical shifts in economic structures. Global warming has been projected as a magical force deviously underlying everything. It is presented by climate scientists and activists as an all-encompassing behemoth of cause and effect, yet nearly all of this frantic pontificating is supported by faith, rather than hard data.
The issue is one of transparency. Without transparency of experimental data, climate scientists and think tank operatives become immune to examination. That is to say, if climate scientists and organizations, many of which are funded by public tax dollars, are not required to reveal the raw data behind their claims on global warming, then their claims are no longer a matter of “fact” or scientific process. Rather, the assertions of climate scientists now become edicts from on high, messages from high priests with a private line to the god of science — a god that no one is allowed to question. Their words become gospel: carbon footprints in the sand.
Climate research institutions like the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have refused for decades to release the raw data behind their experiments, which they say prove the existence of man-made global warming. For many years the CRU refused to release any data that was not first processed to reflect its own desired outcomes and still refuses to release emails that might prove that climate scientists had rigged data in their warming models.
Professor Phil Jones of the CRU in charge of maintaining data sets famously told an Australian climate scientist in 2004:
“Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.”
When opposition became more intense in reaction to the CRU’s secretive data, the organization had this to say:
“We are not in a position to supply data for a particular country not covered by the example agreements referred to earlier, as we have never had sufficient resources to keep track of the exact source of each individual monthly value. Since the 1980s, we have merged the data we have received into existing series or begun new ones, so it is impossible to say if all stations within a particular country or if all of an individual record should be freely available. Data storage availability in the 1980s meant that we were not able to keep the multiple sources for some sites, only the station series after adjustment for homogeneity issues. We, therefore, do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (i.e. quality controlled and homogenized) data.”
Whenever the data issue becomes mainstream and pressure builds, climate scientists simply "lose" the original raw data, and once again we are asked to take them at their word.
Now think about that for a moment. Only in the past few years have climate scientists been pushed to give up raw data to the public, as well as to other unaffiliated scientists, for review. They have enjoyed almost complete immunity from scrutiny since the global warming farce began while acting as the CORE drivers of political and economic policy models by international organizations like the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Future laws and taxes that could affect the entire globe are being written and established on the word of a handful of unaccountable scientists who see their claims as sacrosanct and above investigation.
Despite the assertions of some global warming enthusiasts, little has changed since the release of the hacked “climategate” data and emails or public pressure on climate research institutions. These organizations continue to dismiss data requests made through the Freedom Of Information Act.
Recently, the NOAA released studies which it conveniently claims refutes satellite data proving that there has actually been NO global warming for at least 19 years. When asked by lawmakers to release research papers pertaining to the experiments that supposedly back the assertions of the NOAA, the NOAA refused.
Eventually, apologists for the climate cartel are forced to admit that the raw data is not available to the public. Climate scientists seem to be the only scientists in the world who get away with presenting theories and conclusions without being required to back what they say with hard data. Instead of admitting this is an absurd standard, apologists often defend the act of scientific secrecy, claiming that "average people" are not smart enough to interpret the data even if it was made available to us. We the "profane" public are too unclean to examine the holy books of climate scientists; we are expected to simply bow down to them and globalist entities like the UN as mediators between us and the gods.
Again, there is no available raw data that proves that overt global warming or “climate change” is even occurring, let alone that it is caused by human beings or carbon dioxide. There is far more hard evidence suggesting that changes in climate are determined by the SUN; you know, that massive ball of heat and radiation at the center of our solar system the size of 1.3 million Earths. This was outlined expertly in a Channel Four documentary on the global warming hoax.
Until climate scientists are willing to present their findings including all raw data in a legitimate and transparent manner for independent review, NOTHING they have to say on global warming is relevant. Period. They are not high priests. They are not infallible. They are not even particularly honest. Every chart you see in the mainstream showing warming corresponding to human carbon dioxide production is based on hearsay from these pseudoscientists, not hard evidence. Thus, all current and future laws and regulations based on said hearsay are ultimately erroneous and dangerous.
Unfortunately, corruption within climate research is not where the problem stops. There are people within the halls of power that see the climate change ideology as the perfect vehicle to promote a new kind of social order — an order in which collectivism and centralized governance are “scientifically” indispensable.
The Club of Rome, a globalist think tank with close ties to the climate change agenda stated on page 75 of its publication “The First Global Revolution” in 1990:
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself…"
The passage appears under the subhead “The Common Enemy Of Humanity Is Man.”
There is a particular genius in the strategy of essentially uniting humanity against itself. We have heard arguments from politicians in the mainstream about the infinite threats caused by global warming. We have heard many political leaders from across the world demand centralization under the oversight of the U.N. to stop said threats. From Barack Obama to Vladimir Putin, there is considerable geopolitical consensus that the idea of climate change is real (yes, Putin in his last speech at the U.N. demanded action on climate change and more power to the U.N., proving once again that he is not anti-globalist).
Secretary of State John Kerry, among others, has even suggested that ISIS was caused by climate change. This political rhetoric is meant for the masses who consume 15 minutes or less of news per day from the worst possible mainstream sources.
There are, however, more clever snake-oil salesmen writing what I would call “refined propaganda.” These are the think tank analysts who turn lies into highly reasonable sounding treatise built on complex but always circular logical fallacies. If you want to know how future history texts will be written if the globalists get everything they want, simply read the papers and books of the think tank agents today.
Years ago, I wrote about one of these elitist analysts in “The Linchpin Lie: How Global Collapse Will Be Sold To The Masses.” The article focused on a member of Rand Corporation named John Casti and his propaganda mechanism called the “Linchpin Theory.” Casti presented the false idea that “overcomplexity” was the primary cause of global crisis’ leading to minor incidents cascading like dominoes into worldwide catastrophes. Casti’s solution is, of course, simplification (Translation: globalization and centralization under a streamlined one-world system). This argument conveniently gives a free pass to the organized criminality of international elites — as if these men and their engineered disasters do not exist or never mattered, and all the fiscal pain and endless war we suffer is merely a product of random chaos.
I have come across another think tank elitist peddling a similar propaganda mechanism called “Ecological Panic.” Timothy Snyder is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations and the writer of “Black Earth: The Holocaust As History And Warning.” I highly suggest readers listen to this interview with Snyder on Reuters to get a sense of what I mean by “propaganda.”
Snyder conjures a vast array of disinformation in that interview alone, but I was particularly intrigued with the idea of “ecological panic,” which, I believe, is the next phase (or a more carefully defined phase) in the climate change agenda. Here is a summary:
Snyder presents the foundational theory that crises — more specifically, “holocausts” — are a product of resource scarcity and unrealistic ideas of proper living standards. He blames these unrealistic standards on his own conceptions of free market systems, which supposedly encourage societies to demand more access to resources than what is practical (keep in mind that the elites want to be the people who have the power to determine what is practical and what is not). Snyder offers up the notion that Hitler himself, in a way that is not exactly made clear, was a promoter of a brand of free market greed, which lured unsuspecting Germans into the mentality of war and genocide for profit.
At every turn, Snyder and the Reuters interviewers attempt to link Hitler’s philosophies and actions back to current principles that are original pillars of Western culture. Snyder suggests that Hitler’s social Darwinism is related to the free-market mentality of competition, which he seems to think means competition at any cost. He argues that the German ideal of high living standards was derived from ranking themselves against American standards. The interview leapfrogs into a comparison between the German obsession with high living standards at the onset of fascism and the American conception of high livings standards today.
Ostensibly, the hint is that high living standards lead to totalitarianism and holocausts.
The final thrust of the discussion revolves around the key idea that state conquests for resources along with global warming are today’s “linchpins” for further war, mass immigrations and genocide. Snyder directly relates Hitlerian genocidal philosophy with resource conquest and Hitler’s refusal to take science into account as a warning or a solution. Snyder links this to “ecological panic,” the claim that a lack of resource management and practicality lead to amoral thought processes and genocide. He suggests that global warming is a new catalyst for ecological panic and that the U.S. and much of the world are diving headlong into the same pattern as Nazi Germany out of greed for resources and a refusal to acknowledge the “wisdom” of climate science.
So, if you were wondering where the root source was for the argument that climate change skeptics are the same as “holocaust deniers,” this kind of thinking is it.
Snyder constructs a narrative of moral relativism in which people cannot be saved by enlightenment or moral compass because, according to him (and I am paraphrasing), resource crisis removes all morality from the situation and automatically turns people into monsters. This is yet another elitist attempt to discount inborn conscience as a factor and elevate collectivist control of environment to mold society.
For someone who claims that understanding history requires “undoing the things we think we know implanted in our minds by nationalist history,” Snyder injects a rather ridiculous abstract regurgitation of mainstream history with vast voids of space in his information.
First off, as shown above, Snyder’s primary thesis falls apart if the ideology of man-made global warming is a lie, a lie generated by false data provided by climate scientists who keep the raw and real data to themselves like some kind of occult knowledge.
Second, true free markets did not exist in Germany during the Great Depression or World War II; and they certainly do not exist in America today. I’m getting a little tired of socialists and globalists constantly blaming “free markets” for the problems they created.
Third, Snyder, like Casti from Rand Corporation, completely skips over the historical record when it comes to the influences of internationalists in the creation of disasters or totalitarian governments like the Third Reich. I highly suggest anyone interested in the REAL history of the Nazi Party read the well-documented works of Antony Sutton, including “Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler.”
While consistently attempting to connect Hitler’s fancies and genocidal tendencies to his admiration for American history, Snyder utterly ignores the fact that Hitler’s ideas on genocide were directly affected by the philosophy of eugenics, a philosophy which was launched by global elitists like the Rockefellers in the U.S. in the early 1900s — the same elites who later funded the Nazi infrastructure. Resource entitlement and "ecological panic" had little or nothing to do with Hitler’s eugenics background.
It is documented fact that the success of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is due to the openly admitted support by covert government agencies, including U.S. agencies, tied to internationalist interests — NOT due to global warming, which is perhaps the most insane connect-the-dot theory I have ever heard.
What we have here from this CFR mouthpiece is a carefully crafted rationalization for globalism. Look at it this way: If ecological panic is the primary trigger of collapse, war and industrialized death, the elites escape all blame. They are the ones, after all, trying to “save us” from ourselves by introducing carbon emissions controls, not to mention the idea of population controls.
Global warming becomes a catch-all bogeyman, a Frankenstein monstrosity created by humanity and plaguing humanity. Those who deny the existence of global warming or who question the legitimacy of its high priests (climate scientists) are not exercising their right to skepticism; they are contributing to inevitable genocide. Therefore, climate denial would have to be punished by governments, as climate scientists have been publicly suggesting.
Climate change and Snyder’s world of ecological panic would naturally facilitate the development of population controls and institutionalized eugenics. I have no idea if Snyder is aware of the irony that his ideology is actually more closely related to Hitler’s ideology than free markets ever will be. Being that he is a member of the CFR, I suspect he is aware indeed.
If you want to know why internationalists and collectivists have been force-feeding the climate change agenda to the world despite considerable opposition and well-publicized incidences of exposed fraud on the part of climate scientists, consider the prize at the end of the game. If climate change and ecological panic become ingrained “truths” within our social framework, literally any horror can be justified.
Under ecological panic, human beings must apply social Darwinism in order to survive. Amoral rationalizations must prevail. Pseudoscientists and the establishment become the purveyors of life and death, prosperity and poverty. It will be the elitist class, given license by the power of blind faith rather than hard data, that will determine every aspect of existence from resource allocation, to production, to labor, to relationships and birth, to child rearing, to an individual’s very life span and access to healthcare. Globalism, if allowed to continue in the name of climate defense, will become the most pervasive and powerful cult in history.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by Rasta Red , December 16, 2015
Hey Brandon,
I know I sound like a broken record, but your writing is really spectacular. This is the most concise and accurate epistle on global whatever (warming, cooling, climate change, etc.) that I have ever read. I am going to send it to everyone I know. God Bless you, stay safe, and keep it up!
Rasta Red and Wife
written by Black Cat , December 16, 2015
This article summarizes the conversation I was having with my sister the other day. She is an intellectual, feminist who believes in global warming,etc. My comment to her was that I am skeptical of the science and agenda behind AGW and that the scientists, politicians and insiders behind this theory have been caught many times manipulating data. I am skeptical of the true intentions behind the global warming theory. My other comment to her was that I do believe that we have a legitimate problem going on here on the planet with the abuse and poisoning of our water, soil and air yet find it funny that you hear relative silence from the MSM, EPA,etc. about the likes of Monsanto poisoning the soil and groundwater with glyphosate or the on going ecological disaster from the gulf oil spill, etc. My point is why don't we politicize and bring the hammer of responsibility down on the specific industries, governments and businesses that are predominantly responsible for the actual ecological problems on this planet, that is because these industries,governments and businesses are behind AGW theory and are looking for greater control over the planet with a fabricated excuse to sway public opinion for the likes of their own continued and consolidated enslavement.
written by Pablo , December 16, 2015
Once we destroy the iron curtain, we can live in peace.
Once we destroy the threat of nuclear war, we can live in peace.
Once we win the war on drugs, or the war on terror
(funny how it is always a battle to be won)
you get the gist of this.
climate change/global terrorism/etc. are nothing more than monicker to describe the new battlegrounds for the globalist. A cause to unite for the elites.
When I was young, over population was the ultimate problem to be solved. I guess we won that, as nobody talks about it anymore.
funny how nothing really ever changes.
In reality, it is all about money and power, always has, always will.
everything else is just stage craft.
Thanks Brandon, keep the light burning
written by MAJ , December 16, 2015
I concur with Rasta Red above.
Incredible work Brendon. To be able to assimilate the multitudes of sources and structure it in such a succinct elegant piece that pierces the malicious delibrate fog of manufactured complexityand strikes at the core of the agenda is incredible!
You have great talent at both - the quality of your analysis and the ability to communicate and present the forest to us readers in such a precise clear manner that everything seems self evident. Hats off to you.
It seems surreal - the whole Kabuki theatricality of the world at present - this climate change push, the middle East stage - the horrifying March towards a world where parts of 1984/brave new world are operationalized while the majority around is oblivious. Almost seems a dream.
To add to your climate change article, I would like to point out another aspect of this great Con job. YES, the ecosystem is being affected by anthropomorphic activity - the rainforests, the coastal reefs, the toxic dumping in landfills and water bodies, the fisheries collapse, the monocultural industrial fragile farming that has completely destroyed traditional robust variety local cultivation - all from the rapacious plunder in the name of neoliberal "profit".
BUT FUNNILY the Paris climate theatre was silent about this. Any mention of ecology was wiped out. It's only the fraudulent temperature cycle which frankly occurs as product of cycles ranging from under a century to millions of years - this nebulous " climate change" they promote.
So not only have they used this Trojan horse to push their globalist agenda - through this slieght of hand they have completely captured any discussion of ecosystem impact of the rapacious plundering of our biosphere in the name of profit.
The INSANITY is truly mindboggling surreal. A fun fact - the Builder Berg group had " global cooling" on their agenda a few years back.
written by Gerold , December 16, 2015
Well said, Brandon.
I'm posting the link to your article on FaceBook.
written by brabantian , December 16, 2015
As others note above, Brandon Smith is a spectacular writer & thinker, with some of the most apt quotable gems for the world in which we live. One of these totally classic, worthy-for-posterity Brandon Smith quotes is above:
"A desire for power over others and the need to feel personally superior without any legitimate accomplishment, is perhaps the most dangerous state of being an individual or society can adopt." - Brandon Smith
This quote of Brandon's applies in particular to one mafia group that is unique in its power in the USA ... the mafia of USA corrupt lawyers & the USA judge bribery complex, which is why the US Constitution is no longer honoured
The arrogance of US lawyers and judges is precisely the arrogance in Brandon's quote ... Half the US lawyers are in the arrogant mafia, whilst the other half is too frightened and intimidated to fight it
The corrupt US lawyer mafia is a looming problem for any future USA after an anti-oligarch revolution or secession ... those gangster lawyers will try to take control again because US people are too oriented to think of courts & lawyers, & the lawyer mafia will still think they can run things after secession or revolution
Judge-lawyer bribery are the USA deep state operations most hidden by Google Inc, which censors judge-lawyer crimes under bribed US judge 'court orders to Google', a nice little game they play
USA's judge-lawyer bribery & extortion complex includes:
- Mass USA instant disbarment & career-termination, bankrupting, media ban, even jailing of US lawyers who make even 1 court filing or statement against US deep state (e.g., Richard Fine case but many many others)
- Killing of US federal judges who try to be honest (e.g., John Roll 2011), suiciding of US federal prosecutors, killing of Judiciary Committee Congressmen supervising judges (e.g., once-famous former singer Sonny Bono 1998), so there is NO ONE to help
- Destroying, banning, obscuring or erasing on Google, or killing journos who write about such, & mauling & ruining honest civil liberties efforts (e.g., Jail 4 Judges), vs cabal frauds like ACLU who support elite paedophiles & 'Man Boy Love Association' but ignore most victims, disbarred lawyers, Liberty Movement, etc
written by andysloan , December 16, 2015
Thanks for another good article Brandon.
Outside of the general scope of your commentaries, it should also be noted that satan;
2 Corinthians 4:4
"In whom THE GOD OF THIS WORLD hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them."
can use the lie of global warming, to mask the fact that the increasing number of natural disasters are punishments from God.
The Mother of God to Blessed Elena Aiello (d. 1961 RIP).
‘In order to save souls, I wish that there be propagated in the world the consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Mediatrix of men, devoted to the Mercy of God, and to the Queen of the Universe.’
‘The world will be once more afflicted with great calamity; with bloody revolutions; with great earthquakes; with famines; with epidemics; with fearful hurricanes; and with floods from rivers and seas. But if men do not return to God, purifying fire will fall from the Heavens, like snowstorms, on all peoples, and a great part of humanity will be destroyed!’
See;
http://gloria.tv/?media=293871
Sr Jeanne Le Royer (D. 1798 RIP)
"I see in God that a long time before the rise of the Antichrist the world will be afflicted with many bloody wars. Peoples will rise against peoples, and nations will rise against nations, sometimes allied, sometimes enemies, in their fight against the same party. Army’s will come into frightful collisions and will fill the earth with murder and carnage. These internal and foreign wars will cause enormous sacrifices, profanations, scandals, and infinite evils, because of the incursions that will be made into the Church. As well as that I see the earth will be shaken in different places by frightful earthquakes. I see the whole mountains cracking and splitting with a terrible din. Only too happy will one be if one can escape with no more than a fright; but no, I see out of the gaping mountains whirlwinds of smoke, fire, sulphur and tar, which reduce to cinders entire towns. All this and a thousand other disasters must come before the rise of the Man of Sin."
Ven. Elizabeth Canori-Mora (D. 1825 RIP)
"St. Peter then chose the new pope. The Church was again organized..."
"... the sky was covered with clouds so dense and dismal that it was impossible to look at them without dismay... the avenging arm of God will strike the wicked, and in his mighty power he will punish their pride and presumption. God will employ the powers of hell for the extermination of these impious and heretical persons who desire to overthrow the Church and destroy it's foundation. .... Innumerable legions of demons shall overrun the earth and shall execute the orders of Divine Justice... Nothing on the earth shall be spared. After this frightful punishment I saw the heavens opening, and St. Peter coming down again upon earth; he was vested in his pontifical robes, and surrounded by a great number of angels, who were chanting hymns in his honor, and they proclaimed him as sovereign of the earth. I saw also St. Paul descending upon the earth. By God's command, he traversed the earth and chained the demons, whom he brought before St. Peter, who commanded them to return into hell, whence they had come.
"Then a great light appeared upon the earth which was the sign of the reconciliation of God with man. The angels conducted before the throne of the prince of the Apostles the small flock that had remained faithful to Jesus Christ. These good and zealous Christians testified to him the most profound respect, praising God and thanking the Apostles for having delivered them from the common destruction, and for having protected the Church of Jesus Christ by not permitting Her to be infected with the false maxims of the world. St. Peter then chose the new pope. The Church was again organized..."
Prophecy of Ven. Elizabeth Canori-Mora (d. 1825) as recorded in Father Culleton's book The Prophets and Our Times 1941 A.D. Imprimatur.
The Peace of Our Lord to all!
written by Oliver K. Manuel , December 16, 2015
World leaders, frightened by unreported events at Konan, Korea in Aug-Sept 1945, agreed secretly to save the world from possible nuclear annihilation by telling lies about the source of energy in heavy atoms like uranium and ordinary stars, like the Sun:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/STALINS_SCIENCE.pdf
The Sun is the Creator & Sustainer of every atom, life and planet in the solar system:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf
Dr. Max Planck correctly concluded in Florence, Italy in 1944 that force that makes these atoms is controlled by a "Conscious and intelligent Mind."
http://www.greggbraden.com/resources
written by Beano McReano , December 16, 2015
The only ones seem to be concerned with the "weather" (not global warming) on an ongoing and necessary basis are farmers, boaters, fishermen, pilots and somebody going on vacation.
The only ones concerned about "global warming" on the other hand are the ones that need to worry the LEAST about it. So why are they worrying?
written by Implied Violins , December 16, 2015
Clive,
There is indeed an increase in solar UV being measured around the US; however, the main cause is most likely Geoengineering. Here's a sample article by Dane Wigington of Geoengineeringwatch.com on what the UV is doing and what is causing it:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/extreme-uv-radiation-is-killing-our-trees/
There is a LOT of data on the site far beyond that article which shows this is happening. True, there may be other factors such as a change in the sun and collapsing atmosphere, but the main thing to get the word out about now is Geoengineering. Before that is stopped, we can't really tell just what exactly is going on.
Sincerely,
Implied Violins
written by Organic Gardener , December 16, 2015
Much irony that Snyder supports climate change scientism using Hitler as an illustration given technophile Hitler and his Nazi crew were big on scientism, technocracy, and Scientific Management. Scholars have noted technocrat ideology is diametrically opposed to openness and democratic oversight.
In his book Scientism and Technocracy in the Twentieth Century; The Legacy of Scientific Management (2015), historian Richard Olson wrote Hitler was inclined to turn over national projects to individual scientists and engineers. Examples include PhD chemist Robert Lay assigned to manage labor movements, PhD engineer Fritz Todd assigned major infrastructure projects and concentration camps, and the most prominent Nazi technocrat, architect Albert Speer, appointed Minister of Armaments and War Production, and convicted at Nuremburg after WWII.
Olsen references a 1944 London Observer editorial on Speer: (excerpt) "He rather symbolizes a type which is becoming increasingly important in all the belligerent countries, the pure technician.....with no other aim than to make his way in the world and no other means than his technical and managerial ability. It is the lack of psychological and spiritual ballast which makes this type go far nowadays. This is their age: the Hitlers and HImmlers we may get rid of, but the Speers....will long be with us."
Terrific article and sleuthing. Thank you, Brandon
P.S. and BTW, Olsen's book also goes into much depth on the early Soviet embrace of technocracy and Scientific Management - another cult like mindset of scientism that persists today judging by Russia's long standing experimentation with geoengineering and, AFAIK, Russia being the only govt to formally ask the IPCC to recommend geoengineering (in its 2013 report). In their 1960 book Man Versus Climate, the Russian meteorologist authors boldly propose mankind is on the threshold of the conquest of nature and can be master of the planet.
theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/24/why-geoengineering-suits-russias-carbon-agenda
theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/19/russia-un-climate-report-geoengineering
written by clive m , December 16, 2015
Brandon your rant is one ad hominem after another. If you use the terms "climate change" or "global warming" you are letting them control your thinking. These are vacuous terms.
There is no doubt that the power structure is using “climate change” to control people, but the argument that the earth is not warming because technocrats are controlling the narrative for their own gain contains a serious logical error. The implication of one piece of data you can observe with your own senses is all you need to understand we are screwed and that one thing is UV-B. Only 5% of total UV should be UV-B but it’s consistently measured in the range of 40-60%. This is a disaster. You can measure it yourself if you have a $100 meter. This is why the sun feels like a bonfire on your face in December in Maine or Montana. You can all argue about the reasons why, but that simple, observable fact ALONE is a complete disaster for the earth’s ecosystem. Ocean plankton colony collapse, arctic methane release, the slowing down of the thermohaline conveyor belt because of Greenland/Arctic ice-melt resulting in an ocean level off the East Coast a FOOT higher than average, all of these are the result of this one piece of UV data. How can you say these facts are not and indication of something wrong? I can see with my own eyes the sand dune barriers they are building up and down the US East Coast to keep the ocean at bay (because of “beach erosion,” lol). I feel with my own skin the sun like a laser beam on a 73 degree day the second week of December in NJ. I see the bark burned off of trees by the sun. I can see dozens of methane craters in Siberia from destabalized clathrates. If that happens on the ocean floor of the ESAS, we are friggin' done.
The focus on CO2 is a carbon credit, Agenda 21 scam, yes, but even if SBX frequency explosions in the ionosphere and geoengineering aerosols are the primary causes, which I believe they are, this shit is still actually happening. It is a glaring non sequitor to conclude that these facts don’t exist because the power structure wants to control you when that is their MO for anything and everything. It should be a real learning moment to realize that mainstream global warming advocates and global warming deniers both are ignoring these items. It is much worse than either group understands.
UV-B Measurements:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1yjlhti2AE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-WrJc7Et5I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTTu9r2ROho
Independent Russian researcher Natalia Shakhova (ignored by the IPCC and Royal Society) on arctic methane:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx1Jxk6kjbQ
written by Brandon Smith , December 17, 2015
@clive m
You clearly do not know the definition of "ad hominem".
I use the terms "climate change" and "global warming" because that is how the propaganda is commonly LABELED in the mainstream. How else are people supposed to know what the hell I am referring to? Changing the labels is semantic nonsense that does not further anyone's understanding of the problem.
According to satellite data recently obtained by independent researcher Ross McKitrick, the Earth HAS NOT BEEN WARMING FOR THE PAST 19 YEARS.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2014/02/24/the-period-of-no-global-warming-will-soon-be-longer-than-the-period-of-actual-global-warming/
http://www.desmogblog.com/ross-mckitrick
The NOAA claims that their data refutes his data, yet they continue to refuse to release their data.
Where is your raw data proving that the Earth is warming at all? And if you have that data, where is your proof that it is being caused by human beings?
Where is your source data on a 40%-60% increase in UV-B or that UV-B should be at 5%? Having a UV meter alone is not proof of anything. You have produced nothing but youtube videos while laying down a steaming pile of hearsay.
written by Bright Torch of Liberty , December 17, 2015
Brandon, great analysis on a subject on which I've studied quite a bit, but you've provided some new info for me to digest. Yours is less common, but well thought out angle on this issue.
I started to peruse the publication Club of Rome, publication you mentioned “The First Global Revolution". Reading the Foreward I nearly choked when I read the following sentence:
"The Club has absolutely no political ambition."
Holy smokes! Almost nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to expecting bald faced lies propagated the globalist elites, but this whopper...wow! They make Alinsky look like pikers. It only further reinforces that ANYTHING said groups like the Club should be assumed to be designed either to utterly deceive or to telegraph their marching orders to their faithful globalist tools.
written by Brandon Smith , December 17, 2015
@torch
Another funny thing is that almost every "suggestion" that the Club Of Rome makes on geopolitical policy ends up being passed as a law in multiple countries, or, is being pushed as a law in multiple countries. I'm sure that's all coincidence though and these elites have no ambitions of political or social power whatsoever...
written by Michael K. , December 17, 2015
There certainly are physical changes to the earth going on right now, and denial of this is for fools and manipulators.
The earth is in a period of a fourfold increase in both earthquake and volcano activity since the early 20th century, with hot lava and gasses putting additional heat into the oceans, which have become measurably warmer.
The attempt to set this up as the raison d'etre for draconian carbon regulation is pure nonsense and even evilminded deception. It is base opportunism to divert all of the political energy aimed at oil cartels, pollution and environmental destruction onto an issue that nobody can actually change. It's like protesting winter for being cold.
Look at these charts plotting the rise in all forms of geological activity, connecting to the planetary wobble and relative solar activity:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/09/29/science-explains-why-volcanoes-are-erupting-all-over-the-place-right-now/
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/vortectonics/vortex_correlations2.htm
written by Implied Violins , December 17, 2015
Remember my post on an earlier article about how a mini-ice age may be on the way, as caused by a solar minimum and exacerbated by geoengineering? That fresh water from the Arctic might stop the gulf stream from sending warm water north, and we would see a sudden cooling, resulting in possible chaos in northern countries?
Well, the Russian defense minister agrees:
http://yournewswire.com/russia-warns-of-global-chaos-as-mini-ice-age-winter-arrives/
And again, here Russia is made out to be the 'good guy' pointing out the obvious: things are getting COLDER, not warmer.
written by John Frum , December 17, 2015
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/imag...o,-193,787
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSvb_ZTYS6A
Also highlighting a true immediate crisis that is ignored exposes hypocrisy.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/12/declassified-u-s-government-report-week-fukushima-accident-100-total-spent-fuel-released-atmosphere-unit-4.html
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-10/tepco-admits-fukushima-radiation-leaks-have-spiked-sharply
written by jbrad , December 19, 2015
Brandon, I just started reading your works. How impressive and enlightening. Your comment page is equally represented with illuminated voices. Thank you for your work and may God use you to reach a dark and dying world.
written by Implied Violins , December 31, 2015
A follow up on what is going on with weird arctic weather:
http://www.shiftfrequency.com/geoengineering-from-north-pole-to-atlantic/
It is looking like what I wrote above is happening in real time. I pray that I'm wrong.
This bears close scrutiny, especially for anyone living in northern climes.
written by TonyRUs , May 12, 2016
I love these terms. Climate Denier. Climate Change Denier. Of course, no one is arguing that the climate doesn't change. We had an ice age. Obviously it warmed up. Is the climate changing now? I suspect it is . . now a little warmer . . . now a little cooler. There is only ONE question: Is human activity contributing in any significant way such that stopping this activity can then arrest the change? Is there now a big global thermostat that can be adjusted (up OR down I would guess) with the right amount of money and control are applied?
Whether its economic central planning or central thermostat adjustments, if you trust ANYTHING the government or the government funded scientists (i.e. funded by gov't grants) say you are the real denier that has to be stopped.
written by Lang , May 04, 2019
i tried to get access to the satellite data but ironically it's an error 404: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/ssmi/gridded/index.php?name=data_access
question:
the globalists want to promote "global warming caused by human activities" or "global warming caused by natural climate change"?
if they want to promote the first idea, then what kind of international law they want to make/already made? does it have anything to do with any actual reducing environment poisoning?
