In numerous articles over the years I have outlined in acute detail the agenda for a future one-world economic and governmental system led primarily by banking elites and globalists; an agenda they sometimes refer to as the "New World Order." The term has gained such public exposure and notoriety recently that the globalists have fallen back to using different terminology. Some of them, like the International Monetary Fund's Christine Lagarde, refer to it as the "global economic reset." Others call it the "new multilateralism." Still others refer to it as the "end of the unipolar order," referring to the slow death of the U.S. economy as the central pillar of the global economy.
Whatever label they decide to use, all of them signal a full spectrum destabilization of the "old world" financial and geopolitical system and the ascendance of a tightly controlled one world edifice dominated openly by globalist hubs like the IMF and the BIS.
Too many people, even in the liberty movement, tend to examine only the veneer of this agenda. Some have deluded themselves into thinking the U.S. and the dollar are actually the core of the NWO and are therefore indispensable to the globalists. As I have shown time and time again, the Federal Reserve is now on a fast track to complete its sabotage of the U.S. economy; they would not be instigating instability and crisis to deflate the massive fiscal bubbles they have created unless America was at least partially expendable.
Some believe the NWO is a purely "western" construct and that eastern nations are defending themselves against an encroaching globalist empire. I have also shown that this is nonsense, and that eastern nations work closely with the same exact globalists they are supposedly at war with. This includes Russia's Vladimir Putin, a figure often ignorantly praised by select liberty activists.
What we see in the mainstream is conflict, yes; but it is theatrical conflict. At the end of the day, Eastern leaders pander to globalist high priests at the IMF and BIS and have lunch with NWO icons like Henry Kissinger, just as heads of the Republican Party and even Donald Trump's family go out to parties with Democrat strategists and George Soros.
It's all a kabuki play. All the world is a stage...
So, the question then remains, since the NWO and a one world economic system is in fact a real threat proven to exist through considerable evidence including the very words of prominent globalists, how does such a thing begin? If the U.S. is merely a limb that the globalists are willing to sacrifice in trade to gain even greater centralization, where will the NWO actually take root? As noted, both Eastern and Western nations are at the disposal of the international financiers, so it should come as no surprise that the NWO is seemingly taking shape around the relationship between two nations; one from either side.
As Bloomberg announces with apparent glee in an article titled "China, Germany Step Up As U.S. Retires From World Leadership," Donald Trump risks "uniting cold war allies and foes alike against him." In other words, the future is extreme socialism, the populists are a dangerous and dying breed and globalization marches on without them. The narrative is clearly being established.
The relationship between China and Germany might seem strange, but the two countries are far more alike than many people comprehend. Germany is the industrial and economic centerpiece of the European Union. China is the economic and industrial pillar of Asia. China sells itself as a communist society with capitalist hobbies. Germany sells itself as a capitalist society integrating socialist (communist) programs and social justice mantras. In reality, both nations are collectivist hell-holes, but this is exactly the kind of model the globalists want for the entire world.
Germany has set the stage for the self-flagellating model of "multiculturalism." Angela Merkel is obsessive in her pursuit of the ideal, and this makes sense from a globalist perspective. Multiculturalism requires absolutely uninhibited movement of ideologies and populations across borders, making borders essentially obsolete. Idiot leftists duped by pie-in-the-sky fantasies like "it takes a village to raise a child" have been exploited by the globalists as a tool to push the end of national sovereignty. Merkel's Germany has been at the forefront of this movement in Europe and is now apparently being groomed as an antithesis to Trump.
Germany has also for many years stood as a kind of socialist paradise, with over 25% of their GDP going into entitlement programs so pervasive it is possible for German citizens (women in particular) to live most of their lives without ever having to work. It was this constant flow of tax dollars into welfare programs that attracted a vast number of so-called "refugees" from Islamic countries into the EU, virtually overwhelming the entitlement system and forcing Germany to put restrictions on new citizens.
China has served the NWO model as more of an oppressive economic testing ground. Welfare and universal health insurance are indeed at the forefront of the Chinese government's latest "five year" program. Of course, with hundreds of millions of Chinese living on less than one U.S. dollar per day, the population has no choice but to rely on the generosity of the state. This has molded an economy that is barely tolerable for many, but tolerable enough to keep them from revolting. It is a dynamic the elites would like to apply in every nation.
The Chinese government oversees every aspect of the corporate networks that make up its economy. A Chinese business is in most cases a Chinese government business. There is no such thing as free enterprise in China. China's relationship with globalist institutions is well known. They are one of the first nations to openly call for a new global currency system headed by the IMF and based on the SDR basket. China has also recently been inducted into membership in the SDR basket by the IMF, showing that the back scratching is mutual.
It is this strategy of elevating the SDR basket and replacing the dollar's world reserve status as a precursor to a global currency that has been brought up time and time again by globalists. Recently by Mohamad El-Erian, former CEO of PIMCO in an article titled "Could The IMF's World Currency Help Encourage Global Unity?" Take special note that El-Erian suggests the shift into a global currency system as a way to fight back against the recent "rise of populism."
In order for such a plan to be launched, there has to be some stability somewhere in the world. While many nations face financial crisis on a scale not seen since the Great Depression, the globalists still need to have places to consolidate capital and establish a beachhead for the next assault on sovereignty. This beachhead may come in the form of an economic union between Germany and China, the two NWO favorites.
China is Germany's largest trading partner and Germany has been the top place for Chinese investment in Europe. Last month Merkel and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang met with the intention of "deepening ties" in the face of "protectionism" promoted by Donald Trump. Merkel stated:
"China has become a more important and strategic partner..."
"We are living in times of global uncertainty and see our responsibility to expand our partnership in all the different areas and to push for a world order based on law..."
Germany's ambassador to Beijing, in a recent briefing with reporters leading into G20 stated:
"The economic and political dynamic from a German perspective is moving toward the east."
"The U.S. has left somewhat of a vacuum in the region by abandoning the proposed 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership free-trade agreement..."
As I have argued since before the 2016 election, Donald Trump's job is to be the catalyst for multiple globalist programs which have actually been in the works for decades. Trump is now the excuse for everything. Trump and populism are the excuse for renewed "multilateralism," the excuse for German and Chinese cooperation, the excuse for a new global currency system and, most likely, the scapegoat for the inevitable final stage of our ongoing economic collapse.
Where Trump is supposed to represent the old world order and its "barbarism," Germany and China obviously are being staged as the symbol of something new; a New World Order in which cooperation and interdependency are the great virtues of our epoch. It is my suspicion that along with Russia and China, Germany will be one of the first nations to fully dump the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency when the time comes to shift into the SDR basket system. And, that time is approaching quickly. It is also my suspicion that the globalists are seeking an economic power base from which to project their NWO, and Germany and China fit the bill nicely.
I suggest alternative analysts watch the relationship between these two countries very closely. Their behaviors may signal many changes and dangers ahead.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.
written by stevenguinness , July 12, 2017
Enjoyed your article Brandon.
It got me thinking that if globalists use both China and Germany as bases for their new world order / multilateralism agenda, then what we are seeing today between Russia and the West is a carefully orchestrated ruse to concentrate minds away from the real problem. Vladimir Putin has in the past also called for a new global currency, and Russia itself is a member of both the IMF and the BIS (along with China). But when you think of the history between Russia and the U.S. - the cold war, the Soviet Union etc - society has been trained to recognise Russia as a danger to Western 'democracy' and to our safety. That appears to be where globalists want people to look.
Independent and supposed 'alternative' media outlets are constantly referencing a 'demonetization' of Russia agenda whenever they are accused of something (hacking or an incident in Syria). I hear it all the time in the UK, how some independent journalists are no fan of oligarchs but on this occasion Putin is the 'good guy' who has prevented the U.S. from fulfilling their agenda in Syria. The facts don't bare this out. Putin is as much tied to globalist institutions as Trump is.
written by MiddleAgedHippy , July 12, 2017
Did you see the handshakes between Putin and Trump? I have them down as Freemasons.
written by curtmilr , July 12, 2017
One must be certain of what he speaks. The Soviet communist "experiment", which failed disastrously is not to be confused with historical Russia prior to the revolution which overthrew the Tzars. Until that point, Russia was a part of Europe, not a bipolar enemy of it.
That changed with Marxism, which poisoned not only Russia, but all of the West, to varying degrees, and much of the rest of the world. Basically, if a country is interlocked into the globalist system, it is infected by this globalist toxin.
The U.S. is set up to fail as the market and global military leader. When the fall occurs, I expect the nation to splinter into multiple regional coalitions, which will alternately trade with each other or make war accordingly.
Some fun!
written by ben78 , July 12, 2017
Hi Brandon .
Thanks for your explain and your work .
In France some economic expert who dont believe in economic recovery like Pierre Jovanovic and Charles Sannat say the actual fed rate is too low to collapse the whole economic life.
They rather talk about 5 percent instead of 1.5 percent . I read all your articles but i dont find arguments about that.
Why actual rate of fed could be destroy the economic life?
Is the same rate used by FED before the great depression as today ?
More that central bank like Japan or BCE use QE and low rate .
What is your opinion about that ?
Best regard from France Ben
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Ben
When corporations have to borrow trillions in capital (as evidenced by the TARP audit) from the fed in overnight loans in order to maintain their stock buybacks and keep the Dow propped up, ANY rate increase becomes a massive burden and makes stocks impossible for those companies to manipulate any further.
Overnight loans from the Fed must be FREE, otherwise companies will not be able to afford the interest incurred. As you can already see, the fed has barely raised rates respectively, yet the stock market's meteoric rise since 2009 has now stalled and tech stocks are moving into reversal. Janet Yellen's latest "dovish" comments aside, the fed will continue to hike rates, considering the woman just stated that we will not have another market crisis "in our lifetimes". And, multiple fed officials have openly lamented that the markets are now overvalued.
Many economists have little to no grasp on how much overnight loans from the fed and the fed interest rate have driven the equities bubble. They do not understand how tenuous the situation truly is. The fed does not need to raise rates much to cause another market crash.
written by blanc-pain , July 12, 2017
Hi Brandon,
According to you, Germany is will be a pillar of the next (or new) world order. What about euro, ECB and the current and near bankruptcy of the european banking system ? I remember in 2015 and 2016 Deutshebank case... And now the italian / spanish banks too ; the public debt of every country in EU (especially France, Italy and Spain, but Germany too).
Does the elite want to preserve euro or destroy it to create a new world currency starting with Europe and China ?
Thank you for your articles every week, from France.
ps : Is the decline of american foreign direct investment (outflow) the cause of US decline ? Chinese FDI are increasing while european/american are decreasing...
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@blanc-pain
I still believe parts of the EU (beyond the UK) will break off. Italy seems like the closest to such a move. It would appear though that core nations like Germany and France will maintain their economic union. I think the Euro will be weakened and eventually absorbed into the SDR system, just like the dollar. The dollar is the primary target of the globalists, however, being that it is the world reserve currency and must be destabilized to make way for a truly centralized global system.
Foreign investment outflows may be a side issue, but US decline has been slowed (and now accelerated) by moves in central bank interest rates and QE. Really, we collapsed in 2008. The fed simply put us on life support for 8 years. Now they are systematically pulling the plug.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Steven
Yes, that has been my position for the past few years now. The problem in making people realize this was the amount of Putin hero-worship propaganda flowing through the liberty movement since around 2011. It was truly absurd. It started with the rise of RT as a major liberty movement media source.
I think the plan was to tie the liberty movement to Russia, perhaps in preparation for East vs. West tensions. Russia becomes the villain and so do we by extension. This plan obviously failed, though. There was a time when I was one of the only analysts calling out Putin's ties with the elites. Now there are many. I don't think they can realistically associate us with Russia any longer.
written by MiddleAgedHippy , July 12, 2017
"I still believe parts of the EU (beyond the UK) will break off. Italy seems like the closest to such a move."
That's a little oversimplistic. Inside Italy you have a northern European mentality in the north and a laid back attitude in the south. Same in Spain, also you have Catalonia, Basque Country. It is not so blank bloc as you assume.
Please don't think I'm being disrespectful. i think you are on the right track.
written by CIGA freddie , July 12, 2017
I think China is embracing the western monetary systems as a method of control from within. It is a means to an end, which ultimately sees China as a control mechanism, just as the US has been since Bretton Woods. A casual observer can see its parallel systems to the west: the AAIB (like the IMF), their CIPS money transfer system (like SWIFT), their new credit card, and their hoarding of physical gold. China has a long term view. Sure, embrace western banking systems now, with an eye toward gold based trade and far heavier use of its Yuan later.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Hippy
Calm down, Hippy, we all know you are from Europe, you don't have to try to remind me every single article...
The UK had varying regional cultures and opinions to go with those cultures as well, and yet Brexit happened. I am looking at the overall picture. If the globalists prefer to push Italy towards an exit, regional attitudes are irrelevant. I also said that they seem to be the closest, I didn't say an exit is a guarantee yet.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Freddie
This viewpoint reminds me of the whole "Trump is playing 4D chess" concept. It's a bit fantastical.
China IS a model for the NWO system. Mao was an elitist puppet; a friend of the Yale elites out of Changsha in the 1920's and even edited their student journal. Bertrand Russel just happened to be a visitor and speaker to the school's branch in Changsha, as well.
https://books.google.com/books?id=Wne5gRl4e-kC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=mao+zedong+Yale&source=bl&ots=3PNGCOVtnL&sig=AayQr2-43Ja3X2SsJCN1hd_DqhA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiK9-GhqITVAhVo34MKHTnQAbo4ChDoAQhGMAk#v=onepage&q=mao zedong Yale&f=false
The Rockefellers have been funding and influencing major Chinese institutions since the early 20th century:
http://asiafoundation.org/2011/10/12/the-oil-princes-legacy-rockefeller-philanthropy-in-china/
In 1984, Antony Sutton predicted that China would rise as a global superpower with the help of American elites "by about the year 2000" in his book 'American Secret Establishment'. It appears he was correct:
http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres10/SuttonBones.pdf
The only aspect of China I think the elites would like to change is the population. China is a testing ground for their theories of social control - it has been for over a century. They do what they are told, they are not independent from the globalist system; they are not forward thinking strategists ahead of the game as some people believe.
written by Billy Dole , July 12, 2017
Thank you for your analysis Brandon as usual.
But I really wish people would go into more detail on the matter discussed in my title.
After these events will the US simply become on par with other western powers without world reserve currency status like the EU?Devalued to our displeasure,but not to a huge extent.
Or will we descend into 3rd world status,and a hyper inflationary hell as the economy fails?And trillions of dollars return home after the world stops using us as the preferred currency.Will there be mass death,loss of power/water,riots etc?
Further more which will come first,the economic implosion or the loss of world reserve currency status?Could they occur at the same time?
What can we do to prepare for these things?
Will Precious metals and crypto currencies be of any value to hedge wealth.Gold/silver are helping people in Venezuela apparently.
Will it get so bad that it's necessary to put away large amounts of food and water purification methods?
Or am I wasting my time in thinking we might slip that far?
Answers would be appreciated
written by Shakespeares , July 12, 2017
I recently red also an other interesting piece from George Friedman, Geopolitical Futures. He claims excactly the opposite, that Germany, which exports 50% of its GDP will suffer massive problems. Russia with 50 dollar oil is also facing problems. The United States is the only global power which controls all the world seas.
Do you think all this military power will disappear just because of Trump? Will the United States still be a global power after the dollar will be replaced as world reserve currency?
written by blanc-pain , July 12, 2017
Thank you for your repy Brandon.
I have another question, it's about Mao zedong and the history of China. Do you have any text or author to read about the links between maoism and the globalists ?
I alread know that Mao himself has opened his country to US investors in 1972, next to nixon and kissinger vist. It seems that the new world order will put an end to the world that was born in 1970's (bretton wood's break up, China as world factory, and so on). Maybe we should understand this particular us-china relationship to explain the current crisis.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Blanc
The links to the books and articles I provided above are a good start. China's ties with the globalists go back long before the Nixon era.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Shakespeare
They must be ignoring the fact that every sector of the US economy is now in severe decline except the stock market. Also, they must be ignoring this article from the Rothschild run 'Economist' magazine, which outlines the plan to diminish the US and shift into the SDR basket as a stepping stone to a world currency:
https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/flashback-1988-get-ready-for-a-world-currency-by-2018″-the-economist-magazine/
This does not mean China and Germany will not suffer decline as well, but the agenda is clearly to destroy the US in the process of achieving the NWO.
written by Crickets , July 12, 2017
The New World Odor is all about destroying the West. Mainly America, so you are correct about that.
Once America is out of the way (their greatest desire) darkness will engulf the world and finally lead to the death of all creatures.
These 'elite and peoples should be careful what they wish for. then again it might be exactly what they want.
Doing the wish of THEIR father - SATAN!
written by Seen2013 , July 12, 2017
If I may be so bold:
"After these events will the US simply become on par with other western powers without world reserve currency status like the EU?Devalued to our displeasure,but not to a huge extent."
Neither the US nor EU have finished or fully implemented transition of economic system and justice system, and the US Federal Reserve is propping up the EU's Eurocrisis to protect designated Too Big To Fail Banking Institutions.
"Or will we descend into 3rd world status,and a hyper inflationary hell as the economy fails?And trillions of dollars return home after the world stops using us as the preferred currency.Will there be mass death,loss of power/water,riots etc?
Further more which will come first,the economic implosion or the loss of world reserve currency status?Could they occur at the same time?"
1). Brandon has already iterated that the economic implosion is already in progress, and it's not difficult to confirm particularly through old school measurements.
2). Speaking of old school measurements, the US Dollar's world's reserve currency status makes the difference between over 80% of GDP is a bubble with the status or over 93% of GDP without. Hyperinflation is baked into the cake, and the deficit to debt spending is being used to transition the economic model that can't support the GDP bubble.
3). In short, yes.
"What can we do to prepare for these things?
Will Precious metals and crypto currencies be of any value to hedge wealth.Gold/silver are helping people in Venezuela apparently.
Will it get so bad that it's necessary to put away large amounts of food and water purification methods?
Or am I wasting my time in thinking we might slip that far?"
... I think that your questions rests in; whether, you consider reviving 1870-1960 policy structures and catalysts that also dates to 1492 and prior desirable or capable of going along to get along under conformity.
written by Kel31 , July 12, 2017
One the EU basically has no resources ..I've live in Germany for over a decade in the past and look in horror has they destroy themselves with self imposed immigration hint: Cultures do not get along ..they kill each other. Meaning there will be no Germany. China is an economic mirage like all authoritarian regimes it's good at something, but are a disaster at others. Your points about the US are spot on, but your leadership will not be coming from China or Germany. Generational resistance is growing but I figure looking at your analysis they will be a day late and a dollar shot. Remember as these system decay they will not function. I'm looking at all of these structures that you talk about and I just don't see how they can hold together from a group that has NO ability to enforce anything. Keep in mind your lessons from the past ..FORCE WORKS, Whether Mongol, Roman, Muslim, Western domination was enforce at the point of a blade, Gun, cannon ..one does anything by free will. So me I'll watch with keen interest, but I don't see Germany and China lead anything.
written by Brandon Smith , July 12, 2017
@Kel31
China has access to Africa's resources. The EU has a subservient population. China and Germany will not be "leading" the NWO; I never made such a claim. I said that they will form an economic and strategic union that will be a BEACHHEAD for the NWO. The IMF and BIS will provide the leadership. I already explained in great detail how this would "hold together" under the SDR basket system.
written by Brandon Smith , July 13, 2017
@Marlena
I reference old and new evidence in the article, so your initial criticism is rather dishonest. The new data and admissions support the older globalist admissions. Do you always begin a debate with dishonest analysis? If so, then you are wasting my time.
written by David Utah , July 13, 2017
Marlena's attempt to corner Mr. Smith results in epic failure, lol!
written by Brandon Smith , July 13, 2017
@David
And she/he attempted to continue the dishonest analysis afterwards, completely ignoring my primary point. Typical trolling tactic to divert energies into an endless circular debate. Thus, she/he is booted.
It's interesting, because the amount of Alinsky-style responses I get on any particular article actually HELPS me to know when I am close to a specific truth that some people prefer not be examined. Meaning, they try to attack me personally or my competency rather than dealing with the FACTS related in the article and offering their own counter-evidence. They try to diminish the effect of the article by trying (in vain) to diminish me, because they have no counter evidence to offer.
This article has triggered some folks!
written by Geoffrey , July 13, 2017
Your articles make a lot of sense Brandon, but it's disappointing you appear to regard any dissent as ‘trolling’.
A difference of opinion does not automatically indicate ‘trolling’ but you seem to have developed a 'reds under the bed' view.
Is all you want 'yes, me too' responses?
written by Brandon Smith , July 13, 2017
@Geoffrey
It's unfortunate that you don't have the patience to read what I wrote above. I said exactly what I want, which is a counterview (if you have one) based on facts and evidence rather than half-assed psychological examinations of myself. Some people do this because they are either lazy or ignorant. Others do it because they are paid to come here and disrupt legitimate discussion based on facts. I see no actual response to my article, so the question is, which one are you?
The problem is on your end, my friend, not mine. I'm here to have a REAL debate anytime someone actually has the guts to enter into one using evidence and counter-evidence. I rarely meet any "critic" or "troll" with guts. They tend to prefer cowardly methods of misdirection.
written by Gold Trader , July 13, 2017
+Geoffrey
Not that Brandon needs my help, but you are a f#$king idiot. He's obviously responding to someone using dishonest tactics - ignoring the information present and psychoanalyzing the author. That's called trolling, buddy. Shut up and pay attention next time.
written by Jacob... , July 14, 2017
Hey Brandon, I read most of your articles, but don't always read the comments sections so don't know your relations to posters, ie people you don't reply to, but was hoping you would reply to billy dole's posts. Don't know if it's him or the questions, but to me their good questions.
Also, I agree that Germany will turn their back on America, do you think it will be in relation to trade, or militarily?
Cheers mate, keep up the good work
written by Brandon Smith , July 14, 2017
@Jacob
It's more a matter of the complexity of the post. If someone posts multiple questions that require a whole other essay to answer, then I sometimes have to skip over them and answer the questions later. I only have so much time to spend in the comments section. I am, after all, one of the only writers in the movement that interacts with readers directly in this manner, and there is a good reason for that; the amount of energy required to do this is prohibitive.
I'll try to respond to his post later today.
written by BeastMaster , July 14, 2017
Brandon, you're a lighthouse in a dark night and stormy ocean. Sincere thanks.
Some people asked what may become of the US military. I expect the US military - or at least the equipment - to be gifted to the UN. I do not think the economic and social demise of the US automatically implies the collapse of the military, perhaps only the a change in the ones in charge of that military.
America looks very much like a beast that rose from the earth, that had the characteristics of a lamb before but is now clearly speaking as a dragon. I would expect such a beast to create an image of another beast by bestowing what it can to the UN.
written by The Happy Hindoo , July 15, 2017
A great many things comprise the global Kabuki theater. But I still remain convinced that Putin is at least *trying* to mitigate the NWO super structure as it relates to Russia.
The fact that Putin meets with Kissinger and that Russia's central bank interfaces with the IMF, etc., is just par for the course. It's not like they have a choice, given the current state of the world.
I've been closely following Putin's actions over the past 10+ years, obsessively reading everything I can about him and Russia (from all perspectives). And it just seems that he is the real deal. His hands are tied with the Russian central bank, which remains under globalist control. But just about every action he has taken over the past 10 years , with a few politically shrewd exceptions, is to insulate Russia from the effects of the NWO, without crashing the Russian economy.
Of course I could always be wrong. And nothing surprises me anymore. But I just feel that the evidence is overwhelming that Putin is the real deal. Maybe the *only* real deal in a world of sell-outs and fakes.
written by Brandon Smith , July 15, 2017
@Happy
You are welcome to read my numerous articles on the false East/West paradigm. Putin openly supports the IMF's plan for a global currency system using the SDR. He openly supports the UN's climate change agenda. He placed Henry Kissinger on his economic advisory council. Goldman Sachs is the primary financial manager to the Russian Government. The IMF essentially flooded the Russian elites with cash during the soviet transition. International bankers have been entrenched in Russia since the rise of Bolshevism. None of this is "par for the course" if a country is actually opposed to the globalist cabal.
Too many people are caught up in Putin's rhetoric rather than paying attention to his actions. In fact, every time I deal with the Putin cultists they simply shrug off all the ties he has with the bankers by saying "he has to deal with them". No, no he doesn't. Just as Trump did not have to pack his cabinet with them. These notions are naive at best.
EVERYTHING Putin does aids the globalists. If anyone wants to offer counter evidence which they think proves Putin is opposed to the globalists (not rhetoric - ACTIONS), then by all means, share it. Otherwise, I suggest we stop the wishful thinking and accept that NO ONE rises to power in a major nation without the say so of the central banks.
written by Brandon Smith , July 15, 2017
@Beast
In my analysis it makes more sense for the globalists to try to maintain a certain level of governmental structure within the US until the transition to a world government can be completed. There will be a collapse, yes, but not in the cartoon/TV sense people seem to be obsessed with. It will be systematic and gradual, and the military will likely be told it is in the best interests of the nation to institute martial law "for the safety of everyone". The military will remain intact, to a point...
This does not mean that I believe the plan will succeed. In fact, I have written many articles on why their plan will fail. However, they are going to make the attempt, and many people will be harmed in the process. I suspect that internal divisions will arise within the military structure over time. Civil war is probable.
written by The Happy Hindoo , July 15, 2017
@Brandon
You certainly make a compelling case and I have indeed read most of your articles here on alt-market on the East/West paradigm.
Putting Putin's rhetoric aside, I will take up your request and list a few of his ACTIONS that, as far as I can tell, go against the NWO agenda:
-- Retaliating against the invasion of South Ossetia and Abkhazia and smashing the NWO-backed Georgian army.
-- Removing or disempowering or jailing the worst of the IMF-backed oligarchs and taking back Yukos oil from the Rothschild-backed theft of that national asset. If Putin was a true globalist puppet, he would have just let Rothschild keep Yukos in the same way US allowed Rockefeller/Rothschild to control all US oil assets.
-- Passing laws against "homosexual and transsexual propaganda" aimed at minors (one of the globalists' most insidious pet projects).
-- Paying Russian families to have more children, increasing the Russian population in direct contravention to the NWO depopulation and anti-family plans.
-- Returning Crimea (and its strategic port) back to Russia via a democratic referendum, thwarting a major NWO plan to bring Crimea and all of the Ukraine under full globalist control. If all the actors were indeed on the same side, there would have been no need for the overthrow of the democratically elected Ukrainian government nor the subsequent counter-actions by Russia. To say this is all theater borders on the absurd, since the whole point of globalist theater (and I concede there is a lot of it out there) is to *achieve* their goals, not set them back!
-- Intervening in Syria to smash the globalist-backed ISIS when that proxy army was just inches away from victory and the subsequent conquest of that country (a la Libya). If Putin was truly a globalist puppet, he, like Obama, would have been supplying military assets to ISIS and to the "moderate rebels" instead of destroying them. In such a case, the globalist plan to balkanize Syria would already be a fait accompli. Now it looks like Syria will actually survive as a nation state *with its own independent central bank* to boot!
I could go on with many more significant actions but then this post would be a hundred pages long. Again, I understand where you are coming from and I have researched enough over the past two decades to understand that the globalists do control a vast matrix of illusion. But that matrix is not infinite. There are still authentic human beings out there, some of whom might be in positions of power.
Don't know if you ever read the thesaker(dot)is blog but he has some great content over there (like alt-market) but with a very different take on Russia.
For now I am of the opinion that at least part of the Russian power structure is against the NWO and they are only playing along with globalist institutions until such time that they can engineer a "jail break" from this evil system. At the same time, there is clearly a Russian fifth column that is trying to fully join the NWO.
Finally, none of my thoughts here are absolute. I fully realize I could be wrong and I suppose only time will tell. Either way, I continue to devour your new articles as soon as they are posted!
written by Brandon Smith , July 15, 2017
@Happy
Most of the efforts you cite actually AID the globalists.
1) South Ossetia was a Neo-con project, not necessarily an NWO project. I have seen no evidence connecting it directly to the globalists. Their interests are not necessarily always one and the same. Also, if you consider the fact that Putin is in bed with the globalists on every level from economics to geo-politics, and if the Neo-cons were acting on the behest of globalists, the Georgia incident was essentially the elites playing chess against themselves (this way they always win). I'm not going to speculate on why they felt this was necessary, but you seem to be assuming that because the fight was East vs West that this means it was East vs. Globalist. The globalists often pit two sides against each other while controlling both.
2) Putin did NOT remove IMF backed oligarchs from Russia. This is a myth. In fact, during the soviet transition, the IMF flooded Russia with cash which went straight into the pockets of primary elites in the country, essentially buying off the most importantly positioned people as the confederacy was born. You can read all about this is my article here:
http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2074-russia-is-dominated-by-global-banks-too
The Rothschild business influence has NOT been removed from Russia. They had shares in Yukos, but the incident changed nothing. This is another myth perpetuated by less accurate conspiracy websites. The Rothschilds are ever present and continue to offer economic advisory services to corporations and the Russian government, just as Goldman Sachs does:
https://www.rothschild.com/en/russia-and-the-cis/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-rothschild-idUSKCN0WI27W
If Putin is anti-globalist, then why does he allow these highly placed globalist groups to operate with impunity in his country?
3) George W. Bush was also supposedly "anti gay-agenda", yet, he attends Bohemian Grove, which is basically a big gay rumpus for male politicians and elites. Rhetoric is not the same as belief. I don't see Putin's policies on this matter as strong evidence of anything.
4) Abortion in Russia is legal and highly prevalent. Need I say more on this issue?
5) You should look more into the concept of 4th generation warfare. The elites CREATE wars out of nothing, deliberately, in order to sow chaos in specific regions. They do this, just as they did in Syria, in order to fashion geopolitical trigger points they can use later. Now they have a rationale for a wider war between East and West in Ukraine and in Syria if they wish to start one in the future.
6) See #5....I have been writing since 2010, long before the Syrian "revolution", that Syria would be used by the elites to create a trigger point for wider tensions between East and West. Again, you assume that Putin's activities are opposed to the globalists when they actually serve the globalists. Tensions between East and West are what the globalists WANT. The Russians have done nothing to stop ISIS. In fact, much of ISIS appears to have been exported from Syria into Europe long before Russia acted. Only after the EU opened its borders to Syrian "refugees" did Russia move fully into the region. Rather strange their timing on that, eh?
The real issue in Syria that the globalists want to tap into is exploiting defense ties between Iran/Russia/Syria in order to create a potential catalyst for a wider war (economic or kinetic) between East and West. In the meantime, Putin sits down with his "close friend", Henry Kissinger, Mr. NWO himself, on a regular basis to have lunch and get economic advice.
I could go on as well. Most of these events are not what they seem in the slightest.
I appreciate your readership. Much obliged.
Regards.
written by The Happy Hindoo , July 15, 2017
@Brandon
Great reply, Brandon. Thank you for this, as you have given me a lot to mull over.
I often wish I was independently wealthy enough to research this stuff full time. There is so much to learn. Always another layer and another layer...
If your world model is indeed correct (and I concede it may be) then there is no hope and humanity is royally f**ked! I can certainly deal with these possibilities, as I maintain a healthy detachment from "the world." But it's still a tad disappointing. ;-)
written by Brandon Smith , July 15, 2017
@Happy
I remain optimistic, actually. I think faith in the East (or some other national power) to come and save us from the globalists is designed to keep us inactive and docile. "Hope" can be as destructive as it can be inspiring. The fight is really up to us to engage in and complete. WE have to remove the globalists as a threat. It can be done, but it will probably require considerable sacrifice.
written by Lord Feverstone , July 16, 2017
Superb article as always; well-reasoned, based in deep subject knowledge, and helpful links for context.
I'm in full agreement that TPTB are priming to pin the next economic collapse on the populist right. But I'd be interested in your take on how much President Trump's so-far-successful war on the leftist MSM propaganda machine could potentially railroad their agenda. If that media war is also Kabuki, how does it aid the globalist plans?
I'm cautiously optimistic that Trump might be the real deal , but preparing for the worst regardless.
written by Quincy , July 17, 2017
Brandon,
Will you please write a book on 4th generation warfare, or at least compile a long and detailed article on it? Or if that is not possible, would someone be able to link all of Brandon's articles discussing 4th generation warfare? I am searching for them but I think I am missing a few.
Thanks
written by mangledman , August 22, 2017
It seems like when I type a medium sized comment I have to keep fighting with Captcha for it to post. I have gotten frustrated quite a few times and gone elsewhere. I posted a short post on Daisy Luther's post, and it went through today, so I will try again.
I like your posts because your perspective on lots of the issues at hand is usually more elaborate and educated than my own. Nobody is squeaky clean! I keep pointing out 'why does Putin always end up looking good and smelling like a rose'. I am still waiting for you write something I can really disagree with, but it ain't happened yet. You continue to build up the reasons why I don't buy into a lot of junk.
North Korea doesn't exist in 2025 according to deagel. Who knows how credible this is, but it is intriguing.
written by mielia , October 09, 2017
I've read this article (and to this moment is the first article I read on this page) because you referenced it in another article:
http://alt-market.com/articles...ort ;-)).
After reading I am not so much more puzzled about the headline.
Puzzled I was because I saw (see?) Germany as the country in the western hemisphere which made the most economically destructing moves in the past two decades: Giving up the Bundesbank for the ECB - and as such their "hard" currency policy -, pushing forward the Energiewende (including the shut-down of all nuclear reactors) and astute promoter of the migrant/islamisation phenomenon.
However, you make an entirely different point.
"In reality, both nations are collectivist hell-holes, but this is exactly the kind of model the globalists want for the entire world."
A point which I wouldn't dismiss and also would not believe to necessarily contradict the point I made.
So I'll keep on reading some other entries ;-).
Besides: The quotes by Merkel and the ambassador I would dismiss. Just typical diplomatic blabla.
