
The false left/right paradigm is an often misunderstood concept. Many people who are aware of it sometimes wrongly assume that it asserts the claim that there is "no left or right political spectrum;" that it is all a farce. This is incorrect. In regular society there is indeed a political spectrum among the general populace from socialism/communism/big government (left) to conservatism/free markets/individualism/small government (right). Each citizen sits somewhere on the scale between these two dynamics. The left/right spectrum is in fact real for the average person.
We do not find a " false" paradigm until we examine the beliefs and behaviors of the elitist and political classes. For many banking oligarchs and high level politicians, there is no loyalty to a particular political party or an identifiable "left" or "right" ideology. Many of these people are happy to exploit both sides of the spectrum, if they can, to achieve the goals of globalism; a separate ideology that doesn't really serve the interests of groups on the left or the right. That is to say, globalists pretend as if they care about one side or the other on occasion, but in truth they could not care less about the success of either. They only care about the success of their own exclusive elitist club.
This reality also tends to apply to national loyalty as well. Globalists do not carry any ideological love for any particular nation or culture. They are more than happy to sacrifice and sabotage a country if the action will gain them greater power or centralization in return. A globalist is only "Democrat" or "Republican," or American or Russian or Chinese or European, etc., insofar as the label gets them something that they want.
The reason globalists and the people that work for them adopt certain labels is because through this they can act as gatekeepers and better manipulate the masses. The hot button issue of the week provides us with a case in point...
The organizer of the "Unite The Right" group during the Charlottesville circus, which ended in one death and numerous injured, happened to be an ideological playmate of the extreme left only a year ago. Jason Kessler seemed to come out of nowhere as a leading figure in the white identity or "white nationalist" movement in 2017, but in 2016, he was an avid supporter of Barack Obama, and before that, an active champion of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
I suppose anyone can change their ideological worldview over time, but I'm certainly not stupid enough to believe that Jason Kessler went from hardcore leftist to white nationalist in less than a year. Though it cannot be proven conclusively that Kessler is a provocateur, he certainly idolized the position. Kessler is quoted in his own blog on December 12, 2015, (now shut down but archived) as stating:
"I can't think of any occupation I admire more than the professional provocateur, who has the courage and self-determination to court controversy despite all the slings and arrows of the world."
This is not the first time white nationalists have been exploited by agent provocateurs to make the "political right" in general look bad. And, it is certainly not the first time white nationalists have been discovered to be working directly for the federal government. Klu Klux Klan leader Bill Wilkinson openly admitted to being a FBI informant and cooperator in 1981. Hal Turner, a white supremacist radio personality notorious for calling for the deaths of judges and lawmakers, turned out to be a provocateur paid by the FBI to drum up extremism. He was exposed in 2009 after his arrest led to his admission that almost everything he did was "at the behest of the Federal Bureau of Investigations..."
Why would the government seek to instigate white nationalist groups into violence? Well, you have to examine the larger narrative here.
Anti-conservative propaganda has been overwhelmingly one-track over the past several years. If you are well educated on the activities of deceit machines like the Southern Poverty Law Center, you understand that the thrust of all of their operations has been to tie white nationalism directly to conservative organizations even if there is no connection. I call this "guilt by false association." Keep in mind that the SPLC cooperates closely with government agencies like the DHS and their "Working Group To Counter Violent Extremism" to create profiling techniques to identify "right wing extremists." Meaning, their skewed propaganda is often what the media and government agencies use as a reference when writing articles or implementing policy.
The SPLC is inseparable from the mainstream media and government agendas dealing with conservatives.
In order to justify the madness and violence of the left in recent months, it is more important than ever for the establishment to maintain the lie that conservatives are also all violent racists and "fascists" that need to be destroyed. Propaganda alone is rarely enough to make such notions stick in the public consciousness. Sometimes, provocateurs are needed to "stir the pot."
However, this is only half the equation of the American civil war being engineered before our eyes.
In my article 'The Social Justice Cult Should Blame Itself For The Rise Of Trump' published in August of 2016, I warned that Trump would indeed win the presidential election and that this would actually serve the interests of establishment elites. In the article, I outline the classic division that globalists have used for decades to divide and conquer societies as well as conjure instability and even geopolitical conflicts — namely the communist versus fascist division.
The political left in the U.S. has gone "full retard" as they say, and it is my belief that this is by design. George Soros, an avid globalist and Nazi-collaborator that now pretends to be a "Democrat" (remember, in reality these people have no loyalty to either side), is a prominent figure behind the funding and strategy initiatives of far-left groups like Black Lives Matter and others related to Antifa activities.
The current behavior of SJW groups like Antifa is similar in numerous ways to the actions of Maoists in China during the Cultural Revolution. Maoists sought to erase all vestiges of China's "imperialist history" in a wave of violence that resulted in the destruction of priceless pieces of Chinese historical significance, and the prosecution of political opponents. This unchecked fervor eventually culminated in mass killings of anyone found to be a heretic of the new social justice religion. The only group to truly benefit from the rabid outburst was Mao and the elites of China's political establishment.
The left's uncomfortably similar war against confederate statues in America is not about slavery, and it's certainly not about a respect for life (if that were the case, they would have admonished the shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise by a Bernie Sanders supporter as much as they wailed about the killing of Heather Heyer by a white nationalist). Where was all the outrage from the left over Scalise? And, where was the outrage over Confederate statues during Barack Obama's presidency? Why isn't the left blaming him for the continued existence of these "racist" landmarks?
Clearly, none of these statues glorify slavery in any way, they merely represent a piece of America's past which was far more complex than poorly educated SJW lunatics are able to comprehend. Of course, they don't care about real history, they only care that the issue of confederate statues is a means by which they can implement deconstruction of American cultural heritage, which is predominantly conservative in ideals.
What the left wants is to START with confederate statues because this is easiest for them to rationalize to the public, then move on to the founding fathers, then to the Constitution and round out their assault with the erasure of conservative thought altogether.
What globalists like George Soros want is to encourage leftists to pursue this goal, but not necessarily with the expectation that they will succeed. In fact, the globalists are about to throw the leftists to the wolves.
My readers are well aware of my position on the Trump presidency. I said it before his election and I continue to hold to my prediction to this day; Trump is either a patsy and a scapegoat for the inevitable economic and social crisis that has been brewing within America for years, or, he is a pied piper and willing participant in the scheme. Either way, conservatives are being lashed to the hull of Trump's Titanic, and when it sinks, we are all supposed to go down with it.
The social justice cultism of leftists, growing ever more heinous and illogical, is MEANT to push conservatives not just into the arms of the Trump White House, but it is also meant to push us towards a more totalitarian mindset. The more aggressive the left becomes, the more inclined the right will be to use government as a weapon to pulverize them with an iron fist. This is exactly what globalists want, for once conservatives abandon our Constitutional principles in the name of defeating the left we will have become the monster we have always sought to defend against. We will have lost the long game, and the globalists will have us exactly where they want us.
Communism and fascism are two sides of the same coin. Both ideologies were originally developed and funded by international banks and conglomerates in the early 20th century. For undeniable evidence of this I recommend reading works of Antony Sutton, including Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution, as well as Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler.
Communism is a totalitarian/collectivist model based on the fraudulent premise that the strongest and most successful in a society must be diminished or erased in order to elevate the weak and unsuccessful. All based on the assumption that the strong must have risen to their position through oppression and exploitation. Through this erasure they hope to create "equality."
Fascism is a totalitarian/collectivist model based on the fraudulent premise that the weak and unsuccessful in a society must be diminished or erased because they are a parasitic drain on the strong.
Both rely heavily on the power of government, the blind servitude of the majority and the use of terror to achieve their goals.
Neither of these systems is compatible with conservative philosophy and both of them act as a catalyst for greater centralization and less freedom, which the globalists benefit greatly from. In fact, if you believe in the force of big government and the collectivist mindset then you CANNOT call yourself a conservative. The two worldviews are mutually exclusive.
Conservatives can, though, be corrupted, just like anyone else. In the case of the present day, conservatives are being stabbed with a thousand needles by the left, luring us into a mindset of vengeance and rage. We are also being falsely associated with white nationalist movements (many of them operated by agent provocateurs) that do often promote fascism as if it is some kind of "misunderstood" elixir of stability and utopia. I think it is clear that regardless of who wins — fascists or communists, conservatives are the primary target.
It is my view that the left is cannon fodder in this agenda. They are being wielded like a blunt instrument; a battering ram composed of useful idiots, a buzzing of flies and mosquitoes. Conservatives will be encouraged to act against constitutional values in order to stop this threat in the most brutal way. The time is coming when we will have to make a choice – stand by our values and fight the left the hard way, or abandon our values and serve the globalists by adopting their methods of government totalitarianism. It is my hope that enough of us will stand by the constitution and conscience in this schizophrenic era and disrupt the tides of madness before they erode our nation completely.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Unsuspecting Americans to be Hit Hard by this U.S. Scheme to Confiscate Your Savings: Alan Greenspan, 20-year head of the US Fed, reveals Washington's nasty trick to confiscate the savings of unsuspecting Americans. Here's How Some Americans Are Preparing

written by Greg K , August 23, 2017
"Fascism is a totalitarian/collectivist model...parasitic drain on the strong."
The fascinating thing about Fascism is, the cozy relationship large corporations develop with the government. When they lobby for regulations that hamper the Small Businesses, they have no source for new development. In other words, the big fish kill the little fish that they would otherwise devour. You're right this is true "Parasitism," and as such, as in nature the parasite eventually kills the host. Thus, the parasite dies as well. It is truly antithetical to success.
written by awed bawl , August 23, 2017
BOOM: KKK AND ANTIFA ARRIVING ON SAME BUS TO CHARLOTTESVILLE CONFIRMED
At first I blew this off as unconfirmed rumor, but it is FINALLY CONFIRMED.
This is being driven by forces of evil that are beyond what normal people can think about – Representative Louis Gohmert, (R-TX)
August 21, 2017
In the following clip from Fox News, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) talks about what happened on August 12 in Charlottesville, placing special emphasis on the fact that demonstrators for the Ku Klux Klan and Black Lives Matter arrived at the event on the same bus.
He also stresses the need for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate who paid for sending all those different groups to Charlottesville, and who ordered the stand-down of the police.
OBVIOUSLY YOUTUBE CENSORED THIS, SO HERE IT IS:
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video: http://vid.me/rBZbW
http://82.221.129.208/baaaasepaaged8.html
written by Jay W. Sample , August 23, 2017
Excellent article, Brandon.
It is troubling to realize that we continue to have our own government employing unethical methods to provoke a civil war.... with the FBI behind much of it. I had hoped that Trump would/ could stop this crap. Guess again...
written by Astrocomical , August 23, 2017
Math principle. When you want to DIVIDE something you use the LOWEST COMMON denominator.
In this case the LEFT and LIBERALS!
written by Robert E Lee , August 23, 2017
Don't forget another subplot, the curious fact of cars suddenly being constantly used in terrorist attacks in the last couple of years. The plan is to condition people to equate cars with weapons so that human-operated vehicles will be at first severely restricted and then, ultimately, banned altogether, in favor of autonomous vehicles. The end goal of course is to keep all of the sheep, er, population confined within large cities, removing the right to travel freely.
written by Borat , August 24, 2017
I was watching a documentary recently on Hitler (not surprising, since they are on like 5 times a week on the history channel), and in this one it referred to how Hitler wanted to make an alliance with Britain, but he acknowledged before the war in his writings that the British public are anti-German after years of propaganda during WW1 and therefore wouldn't support any relationship, thus the British elites are politically tied and have no room to manoeuvre. Many British elites, even including Keynes (and one of the British Royals, but I forgot whom), had sympathies / connections to fascist political parties. The elites liked the idea. It makes much more sense reading your comment on communism and fascism (i.e. around elites etc). Hitler saw Churchill as a literal madman who only kept the war running as he was pandering to win votes among the British public basically. Hitler thought any rational leader after France had fallen, and when offered with peace (and even a partnership - for Hitler had a soft spot for the English (at least he claimed)) would accept it, rather than continue war, and with large sections of British elites supporting such a move, but Churchill not, Hitler spoke of him as being a madman at the helm. Obviously Hitler knew the dynamics regarding the English public however, as he wrote before the war. But still, tying this all together with what you wrote on fascism about destroying to weak to prevent the strong from succeeding (i.e. and its focus around the elites) is interesting puts much more sense / context into it all.
written by Borat , August 24, 2017
I guess my next question would be then how does nationalism tie into it all then? Into communism / fascism? Both historically, and present? Since in reality can't you can nationalist communism, and globalist communism for example? Or is communism always global, and it's more forms of socialism that is nationalist?
written by Truth seeker1234 , August 24, 2017
The globalists need to get rid of the right movement becuause the right are for the Constitution. Cant bring in communism until they get rid of that.
written by Liberty4Ever , August 25, 2017
We're almost always offered the false choice between two forms of centralized power. If your plan requires using the power of big government to smite your ideological enemies, then you're not doing it right. You are one of the useful idiots who has been duped into empowering more centralized power and that is always at the cost of personal liberty.
When you find yourself being forced to side with the communists so people won't think you're a Nazi, you're being played. At that point, you are not part of the solution. You are part of the problem.
There are two kinds of fascists: fascists and anti-fascists
- Ennio Flaiano
written by Glittering Images , August 28, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kYSmdp8HO0
written by Stuart Davies , August 29, 2017
Interesting to see that we come to pretty much the same analysis even though you obviously self identify as a conservative and I see myself as a radical progressive, Brandon. One of my few points of disagreements with what you are saying here is that those you call the "left" in the context of these recent events, I see as milk toast "liberal" centrists who actually support completely fake "progressive" politicians like the Clintons and Obama. And, despite their lip service to progressive causes, these politicians in fact work for the transnational corporate oligarchy (whom you call the globalists) just as Trump does - and their neocon/neoliberal policies are in fact profoundly right wing. In other words, as I see it, anyone who supports politicians that serve corporate fascism cannot accurately be called leftists.
written by AG. , August 29, 2017
Hey look at that, right on time ! Best to gear em' up and stoke that military mentality before the coming media blitz has the cops wanting to pummel anything that moves - on the right/left or anywhere in between.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/27/trump-wants-to-lift-ban-on-giving-military-equipment-to-police/
written by Anonymous4u2 , September 02, 2017
Did you take a screenshot of this?
Kessler is quoted in his own blog on December 12, 2015, (now shut down but archived) as stating:
Google has scrubbed it. The link now redirects to a 404
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://src.boblivingstonletter.com/ego/fb7b7453-e59a-4242-8202-4e84743abab8/402503264/318363














